Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 1118476" data-attributes="member: 326">Hi S'mon! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Perhaps that was far too hasty a generalism on my part... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" />Here are the core class breakdowns (CR per level with equipment) as accurately as I can I rate them:Barbarian: 1.106Bard: 1.046Cleric: 1.161Druid: 1.181Fighter: 1.006Monk: 1.136Paladin: 1.049Ranger: 1.089Rogue: 1.011Sorceror: 1.046Wizard: 1.091Top 5: 1st: Druid2nd: Cleric3rd: Monk4th: Barbarian5th: WizardFrom Epic Levels:Barbarian: 1.056Bard: 0.906Cleric: 0.906Druid: 0.926Fighter: 0.966Monk: 1.016Paladin: 0.926Ranger: 0.956Rogue: 0.966Sorceror: 0.736Wizard: 0.736Top 51st: Barbarian2nd: Monk3rd: Fighter & Rogue5th: RangerHowever the major difference the above figures do not yet allow for is the far greater reliance on equipment of Fighter types over Spellcasters - notably with regards attacking (rather than defending).</blockquote>