Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are we, as a wider community, nasty?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6253065" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>Whether elephants are big depends on what you are comparing them to. The normal implicit comparison is to humans, on which scale they are big. But if you were to try discussing elephants in the context of megafauna such as the diplodocus, no. No they aren't.</p><p></p><p>You've asked if we as a community are nasty - a question that is meaningless without a baseline for scale. I see three possible baselines.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">An idealised community that's never nasty. By this standard all real human communities are nasty so the question is meaningless.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">A narrower gaming community - for instance yours. Now I don't know your local gaming community so can't use this on this board.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Other comparable online communities. To me this is the baseline for nice or nasty that makes the most sense. And by those standards we are probably near the bottom of the nicest echelon where the nicest echelon is:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Hobbyist, in it for the love rather than money</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Team rather than individual meaning that other people enrich our experiences</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Cooperative hobby rather than competitive - we don't want to "Smash their bastard, make him want to change his name"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Creating rather than consuming, with the ability to tell canon/the ref to stuff it in the event of a retcon or rules change or just a decision we don't like</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Skills that we need to develop and where everyone started out at rock bottom<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Effectively inexhaustible amounts of creation possible</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No major commercial competition</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No major teams to support</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No major real world impact to get upset about. It isn't a matter of livelihoods or social change.</li> </ul></li> </ul><p></p><p>We're only just in the nicest echelon on most counts - we flirt with competition and consumerism, and didn't start from rock bottom. I'd expect the horticulturalists to be nicer than we are. But compared to just about any fandom, never mind any social change movement then yes we are nice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6253065, member: 87792"] Whether elephants are big depends on what you are comparing them to. The normal implicit comparison is to humans, on which scale they are big. But if you were to try discussing elephants in the context of megafauna such as the diplodocus, no. No they aren't. You've asked if we as a community are nasty - a question that is meaningless without a baseline for scale. I see three possible baselines. [LIST] [*]An idealised community that's never nasty. By this standard all real human communities are nasty so the question is meaningless. [*]A narrower gaming community - for instance yours. Now I don't know your local gaming community so can't use this on this board. [*]Other comparable online communities. To me this is the baseline for nice or nasty that makes the most sense. And by those standards we are probably near the bottom of the nicest echelon where the nicest echelon is: [LIST] [*]Hobbyist, in it for the love rather than money [*]Team rather than individual meaning that other people enrich our experiences [*]Cooperative hobby rather than competitive - we don't want to "Smash their bastard, make him want to change his name" [*]Creating rather than consuming, with the ability to tell canon/the ref to stuff it in the event of a retcon or rules change or just a decision we don't like [*]Skills that we need to develop and where everyone started out at rock bottom [LIST] [*]Effectively inexhaustible amounts of creation possible [*]No major commercial competition [/LIST] [*]No major teams to support [*]No major real world impact to get upset about. It isn't a matter of livelihoods or social change. [/LIST] [/LIST] We're only just in the nicest echelon on most counts - we flirt with competition and consumerism, and didn't start from rock bottom. I'd expect the horticulturalists to be nicer than we are. But compared to just about any fandom, never mind any social change movement then yes we are nice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are we, as a wider community, nasty?
Top