Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are we Taking 10/20 enough?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Souljourner" data-source="post: 794992" data-attributes="member: 1622"><p>I always thought the take 10 and take 20 rules were fairly easy to understand.</p><p></p><p>Take 10 is just doing your average everyday effort, when you aren't really worrying about anything else. About the only time you can't take 10 is when you're in combat. The part about being "rushed" is stupid, just ignore it. You can't "rush" most actions, they take how long they take. When taking 10 you take just as long as usual, you just don't need to roll.</p><p></p><p>Take 20 is just like take 10 except it takes 20 times as long, and you can't do it if there are negative effects for failing. So climbing up 30 feet you can't take 20 on, because if you screw up, you'll fall. You can take 20 on picking a lock, though, since there's no negative effect for failing to pick a lock.</p><p></p><p>It's really very simple. </p><p></p><p>Now, as for actually using these, yeah, a lot of my friends forget they can just take 10. When someone calls for a <blank> check, the automatic reaction is to pick up a die. This happened the other day in an epic campaign we were in. My friend with 30 strength was trying to open a stuck door, and is notorious for rolling crappily. After two failed attempts with bad rolls I was like "dude, just take 10". He did and opened it without incident.</p><p></p><p>I think people think about taking 20 a lot more often than taking 10. Taking 20 is the "crap, this thing is really difficult, I guess we have to waste the time and do it until we get it right". Taking 10 is the "this isn't really an obstacle, so just kinda walk on by" thing. And people forget they can just take 10 instead of having to roll.</p><p></p><p>-The Souljourner</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Souljourner, post: 794992, member: 1622"] I always thought the take 10 and take 20 rules were fairly easy to understand. Take 10 is just doing your average everyday effort, when you aren't really worrying about anything else. About the only time you can't take 10 is when you're in combat. The part about being "rushed" is stupid, just ignore it. You can't "rush" most actions, they take how long they take. When taking 10 you take just as long as usual, you just don't need to roll. Take 20 is just like take 10 except it takes 20 times as long, and you can't do it if there are negative effects for failing. So climbing up 30 feet you can't take 20 on, because if you screw up, you'll fall. You can take 20 on picking a lock, though, since there's no negative effect for failing to pick a lock. It's really very simple. Now, as for actually using these, yeah, a lot of my friends forget they can just take 10. When someone calls for a <blank> check, the automatic reaction is to pick up a die. This happened the other day in an epic campaign we were in. My friend with 30 strength was trying to open a stuck door, and is notorious for rolling crappily. After two failed attempts with bad rolls I was like "dude, just take 10". He did and opened it without incident. I think people think about taking 20 a lot more often than taking 10. Taking 20 is the "crap, this thing is really difficult, I guess we have to waste the time and do it until we get it right". Taking 10 is the "this isn't really an obstacle, so just kinda walk on by" thing. And people forget they can just take 10 instead of having to roll. -The Souljourner [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are we Taking 10/20 enough?
Top