Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are Wizards really all that?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8755855" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>Sure. The DM should allow them to be whatever concept they want to play .... including the Wizard face when there are 3 other faces in the group.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First off I don't buy the hypothesis here, because I have played in A LOT of parties with more than one guy good at social checks and more than one guy good at exploration and more than one front liner and I have <u>NEVER</u> experienced what you describe for the reasons you describe. EVERY time I have seen this happen, it is because of the players not because of the defined classes/roles. If I am a face and I am getting overshadowed by someone else doing all the social checks it is NEVER in my experience because that other character was built to be a "face" or because he was a good "face". It is because the PLAYER is stealing the spotlight and that happens with an 8 Charisma Barbarian with no social skills as much as it does with a 20 charisma bard with expertise.</p><p></p><p>But even if this hypothesis is true there is still a choice at play here. If there are 3 faces in the party and they all CHOSE to play faces and I also CHOOSE to play a face then we are making a CHOICE to play like this and any of us could have CHOSEN to build our respective characters differently. So if my face is overshadowing your face and you don't like it, and it is in fact due to the character and not the personality, then perhaps you should not have played a face.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8755855, member: 7030563"] Sure. The DM should allow them to be whatever concept they want to play .... including the Wizard face when there are 3 other faces in the group. First off I don't buy the hypothesis here, because I have played in A LOT of parties with more than one guy good at social checks and more than one guy good at exploration and more than one front liner and I have [U]NEVER[/U] experienced what you describe for the reasons you describe. EVERY time I have seen this happen, it is because of the players not because of the defined classes/roles. If I am a face and I am getting overshadowed by someone else doing all the social checks it is NEVER in my experience because that other character was built to be a "face" or because he was a good "face". It is because the PLAYER is stealing the spotlight and that happens with an 8 Charisma Barbarian with no social skills as much as it does with a 20 charisma bard with expertise. But even if this hypothesis is true there is still a choice at play here. If there are 3 faces in the party and they all CHOSE to play faces and I also CHOOSE to play a face then we are making a CHOICE to play like this and any of us could have CHOSEN to build our respective characters differently. So if my face is overshadowing your face and you don't like it, and it is in fact due to the character and not the personality, then perhaps you should not have played a face. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are Wizards really all that?
Top