Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Are women just bored of the rings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KaCee" data-source="post: 1284437" data-attributes="member: 15859"><p>Then by your reasoning, why have LotR, Spiderman, Star Wars, and the Matrix all been huge blockbusters when so-called "chick flicks" don't make anywhere the same amount of money?</p><p></p><p>Women comprise slightly more than half of the population and are in charge of more disposable income on average. That's why so much marketing is aimed at women; because women are more likely to do the shopping for a household, from everything from weekly groceries to Christmas gifts.</p><p></p><p>So if there are more women than men, and women spend more than men, why didn't Mona Lisa Smile beat RotK at the box office, or even come close? Why are so many of the allegedly male-centric movies the ones that make all of the money? It can't just be the action angle, because look how badly Charlie's Angel's 2 flopped, and that certainly had a "chick flick" aspect to it.</p><p></p><p>I agree with you that marketers perceive people in terms of delineating factors such as gender, age, race, and geography. They absolutely do. But that doesn't mean they are right...it just means that it's a hell of a lot easier to assume men think with their penises and women with their vaginas than it is to sell products using more honest and ethical tactics. That's why so many things are badly mismarketed. Look at Fight Club. That's a really cool movie that I had NO interest in seeing when it was marketed as a lame-o penis-flick. But then my brother-in-law made us watch it under the promise that it wasn't like its marketing, and boy, was he right. Stupid marketers went for the dick angle instead of promoting the story.</p><p></p><p>Look, maybe you are everything you are stereotyped to be. But I haven't met anyone yet who lives up to even half of their gender and racial stereotypes. Sure, I know women who are obsessed with shoes and shopping, but some of them hate babies and don't care how their butt looks in those pants. The point is, you can't take these multitudes of generalizations and use them to describe diverse groups. You can try and you'll be right once in awhile by chance, but I live in Las Vegas, and let me tell you about the perils of betting on chance...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KaCee, post: 1284437, member: 15859"] Then by your reasoning, why have LotR, Spiderman, Star Wars, and the Matrix all been huge blockbusters when so-called "chick flicks" don't make anywhere the same amount of money? Women comprise slightly more than half of the population and are in charge of more disposable income on average. That's why so much marketing is aimed at women; because women are more likely to do the shopping for a household, from everything from weekly groceries to Christmas gifts. So if there are more women than men, and women spend more than men, why didn't Mona Lisa Smile beat RotK at the box office, or even come close? Why are so many of the allegedly male-centric movies the ones that make all of the money? It can't just be the action angle, because look how badly Charlie's Angel's 2 flopped, and that certainly had a "chick flick" aspect to it. I agree with you that marketers perceive people in terms of delineating factors such as gender, age, race, and geography. They absolutely do. But that doesn't mean they are right...it just means that it's a hell of a lot easier to assume men think with their penises and women with their vaginas than it is to sell products using more honest and ethical tactics. That's why so many things are badly mismarketed. Look at Fight Club. That's a really cool movie that I had NO interest in seeing when it was marketed as a lame-o penis-flick. But then my brother-in-law made us watch it under the promise that it wasn't like its marketing, and boy, was he right. Stupid marketers went for the dick angle instead of promoting the story. Look, maybe you are everything you are stereotyped to be. But I haven't met anyone yet who lives up to even half of their gender and racial stereotypes. Sure, I know women who are obsessed with shoes and shopping, but some of them hate babies and don't care how their butt looks in those pants. The point is, you can't take these multitudes of generalizations and use them to describe diverse groups. You can try and you'll be right once in awhile by chance, but I live in Las Vegas, and let me tell you about the perils of betting on chance... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Are women just bored of the rings?
Top