Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are you excited about the Forgotten Realms setting changes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 4005522" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>It befits anyone discussing things on the internet, and especially someone who is a professional in some sort of research field, to realize that they are not objective (indeed, no-one is, as you say), but rather <em>attempting</em> to be objective. I can respect attempting to be objective, but once you start claiming that you actually are, well, it rings false to me.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Indeed, but this is the internet, land of liars and frauds, and worse, people who convince themselves that they're telling the truth whilst bending it so far that most people would think it fiction. To me, given my experience with the wild claims of internet denizens, your entirely unsupported claims are worse than worthless. They actually detract from the quality of the debate, rather than enhancing it. By posting figures that you point-blank refuse to source in any way, shape, or form, you damage the debate, I would suggest. By alluding to secret knowledge you "cannot share for business reasons" you come across potentially as a phoney, and again you damage the quality of the debate because it becomes about your truthfulness, rather than about the subject. I would suggest you do not continue to mention how this is "your business", do not bring up unsourced figures, and do not allude to secret knowledge. It doesn't help, in my experience, at least <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First you <em>might</em> want to be careful with your language. I'm guessing you're not a native English speaker, because use of the imperative (as bolded) on other people who are cooperating with you, rather your underlings/students, is usually considered somewhat rude. Most people would have put "please" at the beginning of the bolded part. Without please? It sorely tempts me to go post just such a thing immediately <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>As for criticism, well, first off, I think it's very important to have a where the options are more concise and precise. It's also important to balance the number of negative and positive responses.</p><p></p><p>For example, I would have had a title that reflected the poll, rather than a general title about how one feels, I would have made the poll more oriented towards facts rather than feelings, and I would have laid out the answers (assuming I wasn't trying to bias the poll <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) as follows:</p><p></p><p>1. I currently play/run the FR and will likely continue to purchase FR products in 4E, and play/run the 4E setting.</p><p></p><p>2. I currently play/run the FR and will likely continue to purchase FR products in 4E, but play/run the old setting or an extremely variant setting.</p><p></p><p>3. I do not currently play/run the FR, nor have done before, but am interested in playing/running the 4E FR.</p><p></p><p>4. I do not currently play/run the FR, but I am an old FR "fan", and am interested in playing/running the 4E FR.</p><p></p><p>5. I currently play/run the FR, but am uncertain whether I will continue to purchase FR products in 4E.</p><p></p><p>6. I currently play/run the FR, and am very unlikely to continue to purchase FR products in 4E.</p><p></p><p>7. I do not currently play/run the FR, nor have done before, and I am not interested in the 4E FR.</p><p></p><p>8. I do not currently play/run the FR, but I am an old FR "fan", and I am not likely to purchase FR products in 4E.</p><p></p><p>Just off the top of my head. Duller, no doubt, but more accurate, I think. Feel free to criticise/modify.</p></blockquote><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 4005522, member: 18"] It befits anyone discussing things on the internet, and especially someone who is a professional in some sort of research field, to realize that they are not objective (indeed, no-one is, as you say), but rather [I]attempting[/I] to be objective. I can respect attempting to be objective, but once you start claiming that you actually are, well, it rings false to me. Indeed, but this is the internet, land of liars and frauds, and worse, people who convince themselves that they're telling the truth whilst bending it so far that most people would think it fiction. To me, given my experience with the wild claims of internet denizens, your entirely unsupported claims are worse than worthless. They actually detract from the quality of the debate, rather than enhancing it. By posting figures that you point-blank refuse to source in any way, shape, or form, you damage the debate, I would suggest. By alluding to secret knowledge you "cannot share for business reasons" you come across potentially as a phoney, and again you damage the quality of the debate because it becomes about your truthfulness, rather than about the subject. I would suggest you do not continue to mention how this is "your business", do not bring up unsourced figures, and do not allude to secret knowledge. It doesn't help, in my experience, at least ;) First you [I]might[/I] want to be careful with your language. I'm guessing you're not a native English speaker, because use of the imperative (as bolded) on other people who are cooperating with you, rather your underlings/students, is usually considered somewhat rude. Most people would have put "please" at the beginning of the bolded part. Without please? It sorely tempts me to go post just such a thing immediately :) As for criticism, well, first off, I think it's very important to have a where the options are more concise and precise. It's also important to balance the number of negative and positive responses. For example, I would have had a title that reflected the poll, rather than a general title about how one feels, I would have made the poll more oriented towards facts rather than feelings, and I would have laid out the answers (assuming I wasn't trying to bias the poll ;)) as follows: 1. I currently play/run the FR and will likely continue to purchase FR products in 4E, and play/run the 4E setting. 2. I currently play/run the FR and will likely continue to purchase FR products in 4E, but play/run the old setting or an extremely variant setting. 3. I do not currently play/run the FR, nor have done before, but am interested in playing/running the 4E FR. 4. I do not currently play/run the FR, but I am an old FR "fan", and am interested in playing/running the 4E FR. 5. I currently play/run the FR, but am uncertain whether I will continue to purchase FR products in 4E. 6. I currently play/run the FR, and am very unlikely to continue to purchase FR products in 4E. 7. I do not currently play/run the FR, nor have done before, and I am not interested in the 4E FR. 8. I do not currently play/run the FR, but I am an old FR "fan", and I am not likely to purchase FR products in 4E. Just off the top of my head. Duller, no doubt, but more accurate, I think. Feel free to criticise/modify.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Are you excited about the Forgotten Realms setting changes?
Top