Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are you glad that Increased Threat Ranges no longer stack?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seankreynolds" data-source="post: 973010" data-attributes="member: 3029"><p><strong>No, don't change it</strong></p><p></p><p>I don't like the change.</p><p></p><p>I know the reasons why the change was made (apparently stacking those threat ranges made crit-based fighters too good), but I don't agree with that decision.</p><p></p><p>I played a rapier-fighter in Monte's Ptolus campaign for over two years. When I left Washington, the group was all about 12th-14th level. My rogue/ftr/clr had a +2 keen rapier (a +3-equivalent weapon) and Improved Critical (rapier), so he critted on a 12 and had an attack bonus of +21 on his first attack with it. That meant that 45% of my first attacks in each round were a possible crit, and given that we were usually fighting creatures with ACs in the 25-30 range, it meant I had a 50%-75% chance to score a crit with that first attack. Which meant I did an extra 1d6+5 (Strength and magic) damage on that attack.</p><p></p><p>Compare that to Erik Mona, whose aasimar paladin (about the same level, almost exactly the same attack bonus) had a +1 holy greatsword (a +3-equivalent weapon). On EVERY attack, Erik was doing 4d6 damage (+ Strength and magic) (2d6 from greatsword, 2d6 from holy against evil creatures, and we were usually fighting evil creatures).</p><p></p><p>So we both were sub-optimal "fighters" (he was a paladin, I was multiclass), but had comparable attack values. But he routinely did much more damage than I (in fact, the only reason I sometimes caught up was when I could get a +3d6 sneak attack in now and then). Without the stacking threat range, I would have been better off with a +1 flaming shock weapon than my +2 keen weapon and Imp Crit.</p><p></p><p>The finesse-fighter needs threat ranges from those sources to stack or he can't keep up with the tank fighter. In effect, not letting these two abilities stack is punishing the finesse-fighter for choosing (at low level) to be a finesse-fighter ... eventually your attack form is worse than the standard fighter, even though the finesse fighter had to spend 2 feats (Weap Finesse and Imp Crit) to keep up with the standard fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seankreynolds, post: 973010, member: 3029"] [b]No, don't change it[/b] I don't like the change. I know the reasons why the change was made (apparently stacking those threat ranges made crit-based fighters too good), but I don't agree with that decision. I played a rapier-fighter in Monte's Ptolus campaign for over two years. When I left Washington, the group was all about 12th-14th level. My rogue/ftr/clr had a +2 keen rapier (a +3-equivalent weapon) and Improved Critical (rapier), so he critted on a 12 and had an attack bonus of +21 on his first attack with it. That meant that 45% of my first attacks in each round were a possible crit, and given that we were usually fighting creatures with ACs in the 25-30 range, it meant I had a 50%-75% chance to score a crit with that first attack. Which meant I did an extra 1d6+5 (Strength and magic) damage on that attack. Compare that to Erik Mona, whose aasimar paladin (about the same level, almost exactly the same attack bonus) had a +1 holy greatsword (a +3-equivalent weapon). On EVERY attack, Erik was doing 4d6 damage (+ Strength and magic) (2d6 from greatsword, 2d6 from holy against evil creatures, and we were usually fighting evil creatures). So we both were sub-optimal "fighters" (he was a paladin, I was multiclass), but had comparable attack values. But he routinely did much more damage than I (in fact, the only reason I sometimes caught up was when I could get a +3d6 sneak attack in now and then). Without the stacking threat range, I would have been better off with a +1 flaming shock weapon than my +2 keen weapon and Imp Crit. The finesse-fighter needs threat ranges from those sources to stack or he can't keep up with the tank fighter. In effect, not letting these two abilities stack is punishing the finesse-fighter for choosing (at low level) to be a finesse-fighter ... eventually your attack form is worse than the standard fighter, even though the finesse fighter had to spend 2 feats (Weap Finesse and Imp Crit) to keep up with the standard fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are you glad that Increased Threat Ranges no longer stack?
Top