Are you going to change?

[Dareoon Dalandrove]

After reading through all the "corrections" so far for modern some of my players have...put up a fight so to speak about some corrections. For instance tear gas, the book as we all know have the save dc at a whopping 25 and 2d6 rounds for the duration. Now it is down to a 15 and a d6. While I don't mind the change (some of my villians have fallen prey to the ill effects) they are some what dishartend. I have decided to drop to a dc 20 and d6 rounds. I think that it is a nice middle ground. So are any of you not changing or waiting for more offical stamped word?

 

[Plane Sailing]

I'll certainly only be using "corrections" for things which I'm not happy with at the present. Neither I nor my players will go looking for rule changes unless we are unhappy with something (and we are as likely to make something up ourselves!)

Cheers

 

[NeuroZombie]

Same here, I'll only make changes if it seems a) easier to implement or b) makes a heck of a lot more sense

 

[Desdichado]

I"m ignoring corrections entirely, and taking everything on a case by case basis. So far, the only thing I've seen fit to change from the core rulebook is the subdual damage thingy. I prefer the way it's done in D&D.

 

[RangerWickett]

Did they change tasers? Because a taser really oughta disable a normal person 100% of the time that it hits, from my knowledge of the things.