Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with how WOTC's D&D department interacts with the fans (Frequency/ Transparency/Methods)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6670398" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>You're kidding, right?</p><p></p><p>It "couldn't hurt"? Yeah, sure. They can just pop on to say "We're considering doing Eberron, Planescape, and Al-Qadim at some point"... only to have the psychotic masses not only post a thread asking "WHEN IS PLANESCAPE BEING RELEASED?!?", but then NECROing said thread every month to allow people to rant and vent and claim WotC is lying to them when they said they were considering Planescape as a setting. (Hello 'OGL' and 'PDF' threads!)</p><p></p><p>And when it was accurately pointed out that not only might WotC *still* be considering it as a setting, but also that they <em>never gave a timetable for when the setting might actually get released</em>... those salient points would just get ignored and those people would continue to just scream about how WotC sucks and isn't it too bad D&D couldn't be owned by some independent company who would listen to the fans?</p><p></p><p>So yes... it *would* hurt for them to just suggest something that they're casually thinking about. Because some people would get bent out of shape that it wasn't then being released IMMEDIATELY, others would get bent out of shape that they were considering X setting and not the Y setting they thought WotC should be making, and the rest of us would have to wade through all this muck in multitudes of posts and threads banging our heads against our desks as people keep insisting they are deserved something because WotC off-handedly mentioned it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6670398, member: 7006"] You're kidding, right? It "couldn't hurt"? Yeah, sure. They can just pop on to say "We're considering doing Eberron, Planescape, and Al-Qadim at some point"... only to have the psychotic masses not only post a thread asking "WHEN IS PLANESCAPE BEING RELEASED?!?", but then NECROing said thread every month to allow people to rant and vent and claim WotC is lying to them when they said they were considering Planescape as a setting. (Hello 'OGL' and 'PDF' threads!) And when it was accurately pointed out that not only might WotC *still* be considering it as a setting, but also that they [i]never gave a timetable for when the setting might actually get released[/i]... those salient points would just get ignored and those people would continue to just scream about how WotC sucks and isn't it too bad D&D couldn't be owned by some independent company who would listen to the fans? So yes... it *would* hurt for them to just suggest something that they're casually thinking about. Because some people would get bent out of shape that it wasn't then being released IMMEDIATELY, others would get bent out of shape that they were considering X setting and not the Y setting they thought WotC should be making, and the rest of us would have to wade through all this muck in multitudes of posts and threads banging our heads against our desks as people keep insisting they are deserved something because WotC off-handedly mentioned it. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with how WOTC's D&D department interacts with the fans (Frequency/ Transparency/Methods)?
Top