Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with the Bard being a full spellcaster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6274958" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>You can in fact care about the bard but not particularly care if they are full casters in terms of spellcasting slots.</p><p></p><p>And you're incorrect that all the people who don't care said they don't care about the bard. In fact, only one single person said that, and then he retracted it in his edit.</p><p></p><p>Instead people tried to mention the issue of spellcasting slots being different from quantity of spells known and knowable by the bard. Which is a relevant distinction, worth discussing, and which could well be what people care about while they don't care about the number of total slots much. A lot of others said they have insufficient data to draw a conclusion.</p><p></p><p>So, you should want to know if you're hitting on the key issue, by asking people if they think this is the important aspect of the bard change. Hence, people will continue to tell you if they don't care about this change, and what they do care about, even though you don't seem to care what they think. Which, as DEFCON1 mentioned, is something we didn't need to know from you either, that you don't care. We didn't post to this thread to hear you say you don't care about our opinion on the topic you created, any more than you don't care that we have an opinion that doesn't fit neatly into your poll options <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6274958, member: 2525"] You can in fact care about the bard but not particularly care if they are full casters in terms of spellcasting slots. And you're incorrect that all the people who don't care said they don't care about the bard. In fact, only one single person said that, and then he retracted it in his edit. Instead people tried to mention the issue of spellcasting slots being different from quantity of spells known and knowable by the bard. Which is a relevant distinction, worth discussing, and which could well be what people care about while they don't care about the number of total slots much. A lot of others said they have insufficient data to draw a conclusion. So, you should want to know if you're hitting on the key issue, by asking people if they think this is the important aspect of the bard change. Hence, people will continue to tell you if they don't care about this change, and what they do care about, even though you don't seem to care what they think. Which, as DEFCON1 mentioned, is something we didn't need to know from you either, that you don't care. We didn't post to this thread to hear you say you don't care about our opinion on the topic you created, any more than you don't care that we have an opinion that doesn't fit neatly into your poll options :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with the Bard being a full spellcaster?
Top