Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with the Bard being a full spellcaster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sage Genesis" data-source="post: 6275433" data-attributes="member: 6706099"><p>Although we lack a lot of details I think it's safe enough to assume that "full caster" means "casts like a wizard, cleric, or druid" except of course with its own spell list (which might have some overlap with other classes).</p><p></p><p>I don't think I really like that. Spells like that come with their own mechanical ramifications. Spell scrolls, material components, interaction with feats/items/etc., stuff like that. Not sure that's the kind of stuff that bardic magic should do a lot with. It strikes me that more spells means less room for bardic songs as class abilities. I'd rather have seen more of those. You could easily use a mechanic like the monk's ki points and call them... I don't know, verses of power or something. Which you can then use to power all sorts of unique magical effects. Or you could copy the warlock, who apparently has limited spell casting (max spell level is 6th I think Mearls said on twitter?) on top of at-will magical abilities. </p><p></p><p>Given that both such models already exist within the core of Next... why go with full casting? That doesn't match up with tradition, it doesn't match up with their dabbler JoaT concept, and it doesn't really match up with what (most?) people think of when they hear of magic songs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sage Genesis, post: 6275433, member: 6706099"] Although we lack a lot of details I think it's safe enough to assume that "full caster" means "casts like a wizard, cleric, or druid" except of course with its own spell list (which might have some overlap with other classes). I don't think I really like that. Spells like that come with their own mechanical ramifications. Spell scrolls, material components, interaction with feats/items/etc., stuff like that. Not sure that's the kind of stuff that bardic magic should do a lot with. It strikes me that more spells means less room for bardic songs as class abilities. I'd rather have seen more of those. You could easily use a mechanic like the monk's ki points and call them... I don't know, verses of power or something. Which you can then use to power all sorts of unique magical effects. Or you could copy the warlock, who apparently has limited spell casting (max spell level is 6th I think Mearls said on twitter?) on top of at-will magical abilities. Given that both such models already exist within the core of Next... why go with full casting? That doesn't match up with tradition, it doesn't match up with their dabbler JoaT concept, and it doesn't really match up with what (most?) people think of when they hear of magic songs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Are you happy with the Bard being a full spellcaster?
Top