Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9748204" data-attributes="member: 7023840">I'm fine with Hurts as my starting QB. I heard it said about him (and I agree) that he's great to have as your fantasy QB, as long as you don't watch him play. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; Because he can look terrible all game and still end up with between 17-28 points because of the scrambles and the rushing TDs.But that said, unless and until he remembers that he can throw the ball to talented WRs to complement the running, he'll always be a VERY HIGH floor, but limited ceiling guy. IMO, Jackson and Allen will occasionally give you the transcendent performances that might win you a game all by themselves. (In my league, Allen was the first pick of round 3, Jackson was the third, and Daniels (somewhat surprisingly) was the fourth, leaving Hurts to drop to me).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9748204, member: 7023840"] I'm fine with Hurts as my starting QB. I heard it said about him (and I agree) that he's great to have as your fantasy QB, as long as you don't watch him play. ;) Because he can look terrible all game and still end up with between 17-28 points because of the scrambles and the rushing TDs. But that said, unless and until he remembers that he can throw the ball to talented WRs to complement the running, he'll always be a VERY HIGH floor, but limited ceiling guy. IMO, Jackson and Allen will occasionally give you the transcendent performances that might win you a game all by themselves. (In my league, Allen was the first pick of round 3, Jackson was the third, and Daniels (somewhat surprisingly) was the fourth, leaving Hurts to drop to me). [/QUOTE]

Verification