Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 1395386" data-attributes="member: 1656">Likewise <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  But despite that, I still know the 3.5 rules better than anyone else in the group, as far as I can tell.  And I'm not playing a spellcaster, so I don't have any spot-checking to do on durations or what-have-you.Although to be honest, "better than anyone else in the group" isn't saying a whole lot <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  Several of the people I hadn't played with before (third session of this campaign is tomorrow) seemed confident that if a guy with a greatsword is attacking a hobgoblin from the north, and another guy shoots the same hobgoblin with a shortbow from the northwest, that they're flanking him...The DM has picked up a habit of watching my eyebrows, I think... when the wizard's player mentioned his intention to cast an Obscuring Mist that would move with him ('centered on the caster'), I think I must have frowned a little... and the DM quickly looked up the spell and pointed out the "stationary once cast" line <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />-Hyp.</blockquote>

Verification