Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are you tired of being told you hate 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Khur" data-source="post: 4118322" data-attributes="member: 5583"><p>Fair enough. </p><p></p><p>Your statement shores up my point, since seeing a cockroach on your food is enough to make a solid evaluation of the food situation. But that's only as long as one actually sees a cockroach and not what one imagines to be a cockroach for whatever reason, such as seeing something shiny and brown and jumping to a conclusion—or an emotional reaction to something else entirely, such as disliking the cook's politics. If something like that isn’t the case, you're golden.</p><p></p><p>The cockroach analogy is a <em>much simpler</em> situation, though. Furthermore, it's one in which choosing to further participate could be <em>actually</em> harmful. It's not really comparable. Without knowing what your pet cockroach is with reference to 4e, I really can't address whether I think <em>your</em> judgment is irrational. It wouldn't be worth it to make such a specific judgment, regardless. </p><p></p><p>Certainly, my <em>general statement</em> wasn’t meant to address any <em>specific exception.</em> And your specific exception, the validity of which I'm not judging, doesn't alter the veracity of my general statement. All generalities have exceptions, and those exceptions rarely invalidate the generality as a whole.</p><p></p><p>I'll stand by my original statements, which in their generality, are applicable enough. Few people, "fan" or "hater," have enough information to make a sound, well-reasoned judgment about 4e based solely on 4e's merits as a unified RPG system. And just reading the game rules isn't enough to claim one has adequate information. </p><p></p><p>It might be enough for one to claim one doesn't want to try it, based on some personal grievance with the rules as written. That's perfectly valid for an individual to decide. But it's not a point either statement is trying to oppose. It's also valid for one to decide one can't or won't pursue 4e based on circumstances that really have little to do with 4e in itself, such as finances or having enough games to last a lifetime. But such reasons have little to do with 4e as a game, so they're also not part of the point of these statements.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Khur, post: 4118322, member: 5583"] Fair enough. Your statement shores up my point, since seeing a cockroach on your food is enough to make a solid evaluation of the food situation. But that's only as long as one actually sees a cockroach and not what one imagines to be a cockroach for whatever reason, such as seeing something shiny and brown and jumping to a conclusion—or an emotional reaction to something else entirely, such as disliking the cook's politics. If something like that isn’t the case, you're golden. The cockroach analogy is a [I]much simpler[/I] situation, though. Furthermore, it's one in which choosing to further participate could be [I]actually[/I] harmful. It's not really comparable. Without knowing what your pet cockroach is with reference to 4e, I really can't address whether I think [I]your[/I] judgment is irrational. It wouldn't be worth it to make such a specific judgment, regardless. Certainly, my [I]general statement[/I] wasn’t meant to address any [I]specific exception.[/I] And your specific exception, the validity of which I'm not judging, doesn't alter the veracity of my general statement. All generalities have exceptions, and those exceptions rarely invalidate the generality as a whole. I'll stand by my original statements, which in their generality, are applicable enough. Few people, "fan" or "hater," have enough information to make a sound, well-reasoned judgment about 4e based solely on 4e's merits as a unified RPG system. And just reading the game rules isn't enough to claim one has adequate information. It might be enough for one to claim one doesn't want to try it, based on some personal grievance with the rules as written. That's perfectly valid for an individual to decide. But it's not a point either statement is trying to oppose. It's also valid for one to decide one can't or won't pursue 4e based on circumstances that really have little to do with 4e in itself, such as finances or having enough games to last a lifetime. But such reasons have little to do with 4e as a game, so they're also not part of the point of these statements. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are you tired of being told you hate 4E?
Top