Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are your players usually ok with restrictions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oryan77" data-source="post: 5851702" data-attributes="member: 18701"><p>I wanted to give xp for that but I can't. That's pretty funny though. The sad thing is, I bet it would be helpful.</p><p></p><p>Now I'm wanting to create a list of really odd restrictions for my next campaign and just see how the players react. It would be a complete joke, but I would be serious about it at first just to see their reactions.</p><p></p><p>I'll start a new thread about this. We could come up with some pretty funny restrictions.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh definitely yes. From my experience at least. I am forced to play with randoms I meet from the internet. Not everyone is like that. But there is for sure a bunch of people that feel entitled to do whatever they want with their characters even right down to making backgrounds and such. </p><p></p><p>I've had a player get mad at me because I didn't want her 3rd level PC backstory to involve divine intervention and direct contact with a god (that she made up). She preferred to make an entirely different PC (class & race) instead of changing the backstory. She told me I have control issues and I think creating a new PC was her way of telling me that I can't control how she makes a PC. All I did was ask for a tweak to the backstory.</p><p></p><p>I think the biggest thing that helps DMs avoid player entitlement is the word "core". Players are less willing to argue about character creation when you say "core" only. And since sourcebooks are not "core", then they can't demand to use the material in them because they are not "core". </p><p></p><p>I couldn't imagine how difficult players would be if the PHB only had basic rules and all of the racial, class, feats, and spells were all sourcebook only material.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Cool. I'm in a group now that started a new campaign where we are all Monks. Monks are my least favorite class. I would probably have never played one. But I didn't care. I made a PC that I think could be a fun character to play and I've enjoyed myself so far. I never once thought to complain about this restriction. </p><p></p><p>BTW, it just dawned on me that Half-Orcs were banned in this campaign! After all my talk about Half-Orcs as an example, I totally forgot about this. And not a single one of us has asked the DM why Half-Orcs are banned. Why in the world am I just now realizing this? For all we know, he simply banned them because he just doesn't like them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oryan77, post: 5851702, member: 18701"] I wanted to give xp for that but I can't. That's pretty funny though. The sad thing is, I bet it would be helpful. Now I'm wanting to create a list of really odd restrictions for my next campaign and just see how the players react. It would be a complete joke, but I would be serious about it at first just to see their reactions. I'll start a new thread about this. We could come up with some pretty funny restrictions. Oh definitely yes. From my experience at least. I am forced to play with randoms I meet from the internet. Not everyone is like that. But there is for sure a bunch of people that feel entitled to do whatever they want with their characters even right down to making backgrounds and such. I've had a player get mad at me because I didn't want her 3rd level PC backstory to involve divine intervention and direct contact with a god (that she made up). She preferred to make an entirely different PC (class & race) instead of changing the backstory. She told me I have control issues and I think creating a new PC was her way of telling me that I can't control how she makes a PC. All I did was ask for a tweak to the backstory. I think the biggest thing that helps DMs avoid player entitlement is the word "core". Players are less willing to argue about character creation when you say "core" only. And since sourcebooks are not "core", then they can't demand to use the material in them because they are not "core". I couldn't imagine how difficult players would be if the PHB only had basic rules and all of the racial, class, feats, and spells were all sourcebook only material. Cool. I'm in a group now that started a new campaign where we are all Monks. Monks are my least favorite class. I would probably have never played one. But I didn't care. I made a PC that I think could be a fun character to play and I've enjoyed myself so far. I never once thought to complain about this restriction. BTW, it just dawned on me that Half-Orcs were banned in this campaign! After all my talk about Half-Orcs as an example, I totally forgot about this. And not a single one of us has asked the DM why Half-Orcs are banned. Why in the world am I just now realizing this? For all we know, he simply banned them because he just doesn't like them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Are your players usually ok with restrictions?
Top