Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ares I-X
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 4980238" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>The entry about the mission at Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_I-X" target="_blank">here</a> is really good. It breaks down the mission objectives, and the construction of the actual rocket used for the test with a bit about differences between it and the final versions. Being an avionics guy, I found the part about the avionics on the rocket most interesting. Such as, along with the necessary avionics for flight, this version also had 720 thermal, acceleration, acoustic, and vibration sensors all for test data. I always felt that aircraft flight data recorder systems for ASIP* had a lot of sensors. Man, they've got nothing on these rockets!</p><p> </p><p>I've found it surprising, although I guess I shouldn't have, just how similiar avionics on a rocket or the shuttle are to standard aircraft avionics. When I took a tour at NASA this last spring, I was able to identify a good portion of the avionics components inside the Saturn V Instruments Package Ring. Although the components seemed to be much larger versions of what would be on a typical aircraft - and almost 50 year old technology. It had a gyro installed that had to have been well over a hundred pounds. Even most modern directional gyros weigh in at less than 10 pounds. But then, I guess the avionics on a rocket have to withstand significantly more g-forces than an aircrafts avionics.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/ponder.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":hmm:" title="Hmmm :hmm:" data-shortname=":hmm:" /></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Anyways, congratulations to NASA for a successful first test flight.</p><p> </p><p>I'm looking forward to more, and have no doubt that NASA will get us back to the Moon, and eventually on to Mars.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I guess for me, hope springs eternal...</p><p> </p><p>...and I'm gonna dance with the one that brought me!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">(*ASIP stands for Aircraft Structural Integrity Program. Not to be confused with Flight Data Recorders on commercial aircraft. Those record instrument and navigation data about a flight. ASIP Flight Data Recorders record structural integrity data such as signals from strain gauges, in order to monitor the long term health of an aircrafts structure.)</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 4980238, member: 59506"] The entry about the mission at Wikipedia [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_I-X"]here[/URL] is really good. It breaks down the mission objectives, and the construction of the actual rocket used for the test with a bit about differences between it and the final versions. Being an avionics guy, I found the part about the avionics on the rocket most interesting. Such as, along with the necessary avionics for flight, this version also had 720 thermal, acceleration, acoustic, and vibration sensors all for test data. I always felt that aircraft flight data recorder systems for ASIP* had a lot of sensors. Man, they've got nothing on these rockets! I've found it surprising, although I guess I shouldn't have, just how similiar avionics on a rocket or the shuttle are to standard aircraft avionics. When I took a tour at NASA this last spring, I was able to identify a good portion of the avionics components inside the Saturn V Instruments Package Ring. Although the components seemed to be much larger versions of what would be on a typical aircraft - and almost 50 year old technology. It had a gyro installed that had to have been well over a hundred pounds. Even most modern directional gyros weigh in at less than 10 pounds. But then, I guess the avionics on a rocket have to withstand significantly more g-forces than an aircrafts avionics.:hmm: Anyways, congratulations to NASA for a successful first test flight. I'm looking forward to more, and have no doubt that NASA will get us back to the Moon, and eventually on to Mars. I guess for me, hope springs eternal... ...and I'm gonna dance with the one that brought me!:cool: [SIZE=1](*ASIP stands for Aircraft Structural Integrity Program. Not to be confused with Flight Data Recorders on commercial aircraft. Those record instrument and navigation data about a flight. ASIP Flight Data Recorders record structural integrity data such as signals from strain gauges, in order to monitor the long term health of an aircrafts structure.)[/SIZE] [SIZE=1][/SIZE] [SIZE=1]B-)[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Ares I-X
Top