Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
ARG Improved Grab & Constrict KILL SMASH
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hypersmurf" data-source="post: 3825267" data-attributes="member: 1656"><p>It all comes down to how you read the "after making a successful grapple check".</p><p></p><p>If you include an implicit "to damage the opponent" in that sentence, then it makes sense for the claw damage to replace the unarmed strike damage.</p><p></p><p>But if you don't, there are a couple of other ways "after making a successful grapple check" is read. One is "after succeeding at a task that requires a grapple check" - which means it triggers if you successfully pin, if you successfully break a grapple, if you successfully retrieve spell components, and so on. The other is "after beating your opponent in an opposed grapple check", which covers all of the above, plus successfully resisting a pin, preventing them breaking the grapple, preventing them retrieving spell components, etc.</p><p></p><p>Now, if we read "after making a successful grapple check" in either of these ways, we have the following:</p><p></p><p>Without Improved Grab:</p><p>Pin: pins opponent.</p><p>Retrieve spell components: retrieves spell components.</p><p>Break grapple: breaks the grapple.</p><p>Damage opponent: deals unarmed strike damage.</p><p></p><p>With Improved Grab:</p><p>Pin: pins opponent, plus claw damage.</p><p>Retrieve spell components: retrieves spell components, plus claw damage.</p><p>Break grapple: breaks the grapple, plus claw damage.</p><p>Damage opponent: <s>deals unarmed strike damage</s>, plus claw damage.</p><p></p><p>... does it make sense in this case for the damage opponent action to lose utility, unlike all the other actions? It doesn't, so it should still have its normal effect - deal unarmed strike damage - in addition to the claw damage.</p><p></p><p>I personally read "after making a successful grapple check" in this context to mean "after making a successful grapple check to damage your opponent", which means that pin just pins, and break grapple just breaks the grapple, but damage opponent replaces poor non-lethal unarmed strike damage with savage lethal natural weapon damage - a clear benefit to taking the damage opponent option.</p><p></p><p>But if you take one of the broader readings, damage opponent (without unarmed strike damage) becomes pointless, because every other option requiring a grapple check does everything damage opponent does, plus more. If the unarmed strike damage remains part of the effect, however, there's still a reason to choose that option.</p><p></p><p>-Hyp.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hypersmurf, post: 3825267, member: 1656"] It all comes down to how you read the "after making a successful grapple check". If you include an implicit "to damage the opponent" in that sentence, then it makes sense for the claw damage to replace the unarmed strike damage. But if you don't, there are a couple of other ways "after making a successful grapple check" is read. One is "after succeeding at a task that requires a grapple check" - which means it triggers if you successfully pin, if you successfully break a grapple, if you successfully retrieve spell components, and so on. The other is "after beating your opponent in an opposed grapple check", which covers all of the above, plus successfully resisting a pin, preventing them breaking the grapple, preventing them retrieving spell components, etc. Now, if we read "after making a successful grapple check" in either of these ways, we have the following: Without Improved Grab: Pin: pins opponent. Retrieve spell components: retrieves spell components. Break grapple: breaks the grapple. Damage opponent: deals unarmed strike damage. With Improved Grab: Pin: pins opponent, plus claw damage. Retrieve spell components: retrieves spell components, plus claw damage. Break grapple: breaks the grapple, plus claw damage. Damage opponent: [s]deals unarmed strike damage[/s], plus claw damage. ... does it make sense in this case for the damage opponent action to lose utility, unlike all the other actions? It doesn't, so it should still have its normal effect - deal unarmed strike damage - in addition to the claw damage. I personally read "after making a successful grapple check" in this context to mean "after making a successful grapple check to damage your opponent", which means that pin just pins, and break grapple just breaks the grapple, but damage opponent replaces poor non-lethal unarmed strike damage with savage lethal natural weapon damage - a clear benefit to taking the damage opponent option. But if you take one of the broader readings, damage opponent (without unarmed strike damage) becomes pointless, because every other option requiring a grapple check does everything damage opponent does, plus more. If the unarmed strike damage remains part of the effect, however, there's still a reason to choose that option. -Hyp. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
ARG Improved Grab & Constrict KILL SMASH
Top