Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Arguments and assumptions against multi classing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7488421" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>In previous editions, paladins could fall and lose their class abilities. We <em>know</em> this, because the rules said so. Rules As Written.</p><p></p><p>But in 5e, such rules are conspicuous by their absence. The lack of such rules =/= these rules exist RAW, because Rules As NOT Written are not Rules AS Written.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First, the examples I quoted from the very fiction that inspired the hobby, plus <em>actual written</em> 5e text to the tune of some patrons don't pay any attention to their warlocks, shows clearly that it is NOT a given that such beings automatically punish transgressors.</p><p></p><p>Second, even those beings who are inclined to punish wayward servants do so by in-game means, such as sending more and more powerful loyal servants to persuade/kill the naughty PCs. What they <em>don't</em> do is punish them by metagaming! They don't mess with our real world character sheets, they mess with the game-world characters!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And here is an assumption: the player is deliberately playing <em>wrong!</em> But in my experience what happens is that the player and DM disagree about the best way to role-play their devotion. In real life religious people, even of the same religion/denomination/church disagree about religious matters, and each still goes on happily being a member of that religion. But the DMs I'm talking about say it's their way or the highway, taking away the player's agency.</p><p></p><p>The first example character in my previous post was a Pal/War whose parents sold her soul to a fiend, left her on the steps of the temple to Helm, was brought up and trained to be a good paladin, while the fiend was secretly rubbing his hands with glee in the thought that he could slowly corrupt a high level paladin. It just would not make ANY sense for the fiend to take her warlock powers away because that would defeat the fiend's own object, and it wouldn't make any sense for Helm to cripple his own paladin's fight against the will of the fiend.</p><p></p><p>Yet, on this forum and in real life, the knee-jerk reaction of some DMs is, "Paladin/Warlock? The player MUST be making a mockery of the story and the PC cannot possibly make sense!" Ban, ban, ban!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7488421, member: 6799649"] In previous editions, paladins could fall and lose their class abilities. We [i]know[/i] this, because the rules said so. Rules As Written. But in 5e, such rules are conspicuous by their absence. The lack of such rules =/= these rules exist RAW, because Rules As NOT Written are not Rules AS Written. First, the examples I quoted from the very fiction that inspired the hobby, plus [i]actual written[/i] 5e text to the tune of some patrons don't pay any attention to their warlocks, shows clearly that it is NOT a given that such beings automatically punish transgressors. Second, even those beings who are inclined to punish wayward servants do so by in-game means, such as sending more and more powerful loyal servants to persuade/kill the naughty PCs. What they [i]don't[/i] do is punish them by metagaming! They don't mess with our real world character sheets, they mess with the game-world characters! And here is an assumption: the player is deliberately playing [i]wrong![/i] But in my experience what happens is that the player and DM disagree about the best way to role-play their devotion. In real life religious people, even of the same religion/denomination/church disagree about religious matters, and each still goes on happily being a member of that religion. But the DMs I'm talking about say it's their way or the highway, taking away the player's agency. The first example character in my previous post was a Pal/War whose parents sold her soul to a fiend, left her on the steps of the temple to Helm, was brought up and trained to be a good paladin, while the fiend was secretly rubbing his hands with glee in the thought that he could slowly corrupt a high level paladin. It just would not make ANY sense for the fiend to take her warlock powers away because that would defeat the fiend's own object, and it wouldn't make any sense for Helm to cripple his own paladin's fight against the will of the fiend. Yet, on this forum and in real life, the knee-jerk reaction of some DMs is, "Paladin/Warlock? The player MUST be making a mockery of the story and the PC cannot possibly make sense!" Ban, ban, ban! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Arguments and assumptions against multi classing
Top