Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7488874" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Hmmm... comparing that to the post it was directed at warlock pally multi-class...it almost seems as if one person/poster was referencing a build that used an optional rule and the other was referencing a core one in juxtaposition to it.That seems odd? But to the point YES &quot;some GMs IRl and here may look at multi-classing and yell ban ban ban!YES some GMS may look at multi-classing warlock and pally and yell ban ban ban!YES some Gms may look at a player who wants to multi-class warlock and pally and see a player who is just power gaming and see no possibility worth mentioning of a good story path.YES other Gms like me may see it as perfectly fine - given the right story and background and subject it to the same scrutiny of story that other multi-class are.Which sort of starts to skethc in a line where a player should perhaps not feel its an affront to their ***PLAYER AGENCY THUNDEROUS RIGHT OF DOOM*** to look at optional rules (multi-classing) and classes where there are lotsa of statements about things to work thru with GM as part of creation and especially very close links to an NPC agency and feel entitled to have it all work out the way they want and the other &quot;agency&quot; to have basically little more than a toothless sham of a position of influence.Either side of a collaboration can be a jerk, after all.Some</blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7488874, member: 6919838"] Hmmm... comparing that to the post it was directed at warlock pally multi-class... it almost seems as if one person/poster was referencing a build that used an optional rule and the other was referencing a core one in juxtaposition to it. That seems odd? But to the point YES "some GMs IRl and here may look at multi-classing and yell ban ban ban! YES some GMS may look at multi-classing warlock and pally and yell ban ban ban! YES some Gms may look at a player who wants to multi-class warlock and pally and see a player who is just power gaming and see no possibility worth mentioning of a good story path. YES other Gms like me may see it as perfectly fine - given the right story and background and subject it to the same scrutiny of story that other multi-class are. Which sort of starts to skethc in a line where a player should perhaps not feel its an affront to their ***PLAYER AGENCY THUNDEROUS RIGHT OF DOOM*** to look at optional rules (multi-classing) and classes where there are lotsa of statements about things to work thru with GM as part of creation and especially very close links to an NPC agency and feel entitled to have it all work out the way they want and the other "agency" to have basically little more than a toothless sham of a position of influence. Either side of a collaboration can be a jerk, after all. Some [/QUOTE]

Verification