Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ancalagon" data-source="post: 7491637" data-attributes="member: 23">To get back on topic, I will say this:&nbsp; multiclassing in 5e is less &quot;necessary&quot; than in previous editions. &nbsp;[MENTION=45197]pming[/MENTION] noted how he like the fighter-mage-thief.&nbsp;&nbsp; And yes, its a cool concept... and it can be done in 5e without multi-classing.1:&nbsp; Eldritch Knight with criminal backgroundWant more &quot;mage&quot;?2:&nbsp; Hexblade with criminal backgroundor3:&nbsp; Wizard bladesigner with criminal backgroundwant more &quot;rogue&quot;?4:&nbsp; Arcane trickster with soldier background&nbsp; (maybe take dwarf for the armor/weaponry).&nbsp; I'm sure there are several other ways of doing the same. This might not be the same as 2e multiclassing.&nbsp; But the first time we can do this much without multiclassing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ancalagon, post: 7491637, member: 23"] To get back on topic, I will say this: multiclassing in 5e is less "necessary" than in previous editions. [MENTION=45197]pming[/MENTION] noted how he like the fighter-mage-thief. And yes, its a cool concept... and it can be done in 5e without multi-classing. 1: Eldritch Knight with criminal background Want more "mage"? 2: Hexblade with criminal background or 3: Wizard bladesigner with criminal background want more "rogue"? 4: Arcane trickster with soldier background (maybe take dwarf for the armor/weaponry). I'm sure there are several other ways of doing the same. This might not be the same as 2e multiclassing. But the first time we can do this much without multiclassing. [/QUOTE]

Verification