Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7493687" data-attributes="member: 16814">I do get your point, I get it violently.&nbsp; You seem to be missing mine.&nbsp; Different tables play differently, yes, totes agree.&nbsp; My point is that when responding to 'why not indulge' with PC killing as a replacement argument, you're insinuating that the other poster can't tell the difference between a behavior that is compromising within the social contract and one that breaks it.&nbsp; That's not necessary to make your point, which, again, is 100% valid.&nbsp; If everyone at your table prefers strong class fiction, then the answer to 'why not indulge' is 'we don't like to play that way.'&nbsp; Not 'imagine that instead of a class fiction change for your character, the issue is a PC killer...'&nbsp; Your examples are so clearly bad that the consideration of them stops at, 'well, I wouldn't play with a jerk.'&nbsp; That's my point -- you keep hiding yours behind over-the-top examples.Now, I recognize that this response may cause an automatic block by you without even reading it or considering it.&nbsp; As I enjoy your posts, and think you have a great viewpoint to contribute, that saddens me.&nbsp; However, one of my flaws is to run straight at bullying, and, frankly, your post above is an attempt to silence me through bullying.&nbsp; I think you're better than that.&nbsp; Prove me right.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7493687, member: 16814"] I do get your point, I get it violently. You seem to be missing mine. Different tables play differently, yes, totes agree. My point is that when responding to 'why not indulge' with PC killing as a replacement argument, you're insinuating that the other poster can't tell the difference between a behavior that is compromising within the social contract and one that breaks it. That's not necessary to make your point, which, again, is 100% valid. If everyone at your table prefers strong class fiction, then the answer to 'why not indulge' is 'we don't like to play that way.' Not 'imagine that instead of a class fiction change for your character, the issue is a PC killer...' Your examples are so clearly bad that the consideration of them stops at, 'well, I wouldn't play with a jerk.' That's my point -- you keep hiding yours behind over-the-top examples. Now, I recognize that this response may cause an automatic block by you without even reading it or considering it. As I enjoy your posts, and think you have a great viewpoint to contribute, that saddens me. However, one of my flaws is to run straight at bullying, and, frankly, your post above is an attempt to silence me through bullying. I think you're better than that. Prove me right. [/QUOTE]

Verification