Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Arguments and assumptions against multi classing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7494494" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">I invariably try to avoid treading on other players' toes this way, and encourage others to do the same, by the simple expedient of getting the players together as soon as the new campaign is announced and discuss who wants to play what type of character. That way we can ensure a well-balanced party, or even a <em>deliberately</em> unbalanced party (as opposed to an inadvertently unbalanced one).</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">If a player replaces one PC with another, that player will already take into account the party make-up so can choose a class/race/etc. accordingly.</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">If a new player wants to join, they aren't told what class they MUST play, they are told what the rest of the party already is.</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">Once I was dragged to a university RPG club night. He attended that university as a mature student, while I never attended any university. We looked for a game to join, and the only one available was a game of Basic. Now this was around the late '90s, and up to that point had played 1e and 2e AD&D for about 20 years, but never actually played Basic or the other BECMI set. After all, I started with <u>ADVANCED</u> D&D, why would I go and play the training wheels version?</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">I fancied playing an elf, which I knew was both race AND class in this game (unlike in REAL D&D!), but one player (who had been playing this campaign for a while) was already playing an elf. Not wanting to tread on her toes, I thought I'd ask her what weapon she was using so that I could deliberately choose something different. When I asked, her reply was, "I don't know, but it does 1d8 damage".</span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333">But the point is, this is not a game RULE! It is etiquette. I can understand why someone would be upset if my PC took their party status as 'best X' in the group away. But I do not understand why a player playing, say, a rogue would be upset if my PC was a fighter/mage when they would not be upset if I were playing a fighter or a mage.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So why is my preference to play a multiclass PC less valid than theirs? Why am I not allowed to play my preference but they are allowed to play theirs? Why would it upset them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7494494, member: 6799649"] [COLOR=#333333] I invariably try to avoid treading on other players' toes this way, and encourage others to do the same, by the simple expedient of getting the players together as soon as the new campaign is announced and discuss who wants to play what type of character. That way we can ensure a well-balanced party, or even a [I]deliberately[/I] unbalanced party (as opposed to an inadvertently unbalanced one). If a player replaces one PC with another, that player will already take into account the party make-up so can choose a class/race/etc. accordingly. If a new player wants to join, they aren't told what class they MUST play, they are told what the rest of the party already is. Once I was dragged to a university RPG club night. He attended that university as a mature student, while I never attended any university. We looked for a game to join, and the only one available was a game of Basic. Now this was around the late '90s, and up to that point had played 1e and 2e AD&D for about 20 years, but never actually played Basic or the other BECMI set. After all, I started with [u]ADVANCED[/u] D&D, why would I go and play the training wheels version? I fancied playing an elf, which I knew was both race AND class in this game (unlike in REAL D&D!), but one player (who had been playing this campaign for a while) was already playing an elf. Not wanting to tread on her toes, I thought I'd ask her what weapon she was using so that I could deliberately choose something different. When I asked, her reply was, "I don't know, but it does 1d8 damage". But the point is, this is not a game RULE! It is etiquette. I can understand why someone would be upset if my PC took their party status as 'best X' in the group away. But I do not understand why a player playing, say, a rogue would be upset if my PC was a fighter/mage when they would not be upset if I were playing a fighter or a mage.[/COLOR] So why is my preference to play a multiclass PC less valid than theirs? Why am I not allowed to play my preference but they are allowed to play theirs? Why would it upset them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Arguments and assumptions against multi classing
Top