Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Ari Marmell's blog] To House Rule or Not to House Rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5200423" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Well let's think for a minute... The DMG was released in...Sept 2000, I believe the first player-centric splatbook (featuring PRC's) was Sword & Fist which was released in January 2001, that's a 3 month span between the two. Now unless development and lead times have drastically increased since 2000, I can only assume WotC purposefully put them in player centric products since these products were designed before any measure of popularity could be gauged.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Oh, you mean like the Player's Guide to the Sabatt? Which was a guide for players to create and run Sabatt PC's. I don't think this is exactly the same thing as a part of the game designed to be purely GM territory, and only in GM books. This is like claiming the Dragonblooded in Exalted were only suppose to be GM antagonists and not played as characters because they first showed up as antagonists... yet they got a fatsplat for players. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I'm curious what exactly did your players throw a fit about not being able to use from these books?</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Uhmm... I'm not trying to hurt your feelings (not even sure where that came from). So what exactly are your thoughts on why? </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Why is it that some people often exaggerate beyond it being their own oppinion (as opposed to a real fact) that they somehow <strong>must</strong> use things from various books in D&D?</p><p> </p><p>I guess I'm so used to running 3.5 where I as DM say these are the books I am using in my campaign, and then listing anything from those books I disallow... that I haven't had the experience of a player showing up with some random, out of nowhere, game element and trying to force it on me. Of course if they did I would just say no or yes depending on my evaluation of it. </p><p> </p><p>I must say after reading your second paragraph, I find it strange that (especially with DDI) one of your playershasn't requested the hybrid rules, especially as you've had players who went through DMG 2 and Unearthed Arcana scouring for stuff to use.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>No need to be sorry, I didn't loose an element I enjoyed... I still have my 3.5 books (and the hybrid rules for 4e). Though I would like to see some more of these elements in 4e. Perhaps the Dark Sun Defiler rules will also be this type of game element.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 5200423, member: 48965"] Well let's think for a minute... The DMG was released in...Sept 2000, I believe the first player-centric splatbook (featuring PRC's) was Sword & Fist which was released in January 2001, that's a 3 month span between the two. Now unless development and lead times have drastically increased since 2000, I can only assume WotC purposefully put them in player centric products since these products were designed before any measure of popularity could be gauged. Oh, you mean like the Player's Guide to the Sabatt? Which was a guide for players to create and run Sabatt PC's. I don't think this is exactly the same thing as a part of the game designed to be purely GM territory, and only in GM books. This is like claiming the Dragonblooded in Exalted were only suppose to be GM antagonists and not played as characters because they first showed up as antagonists... yet they got a fatsplat for players. I'm curious what exactly did your players throw a fit about not being able to use from these books? Uhmm... I'm not trying to hurt your feelings (not even sure where that came from). So what exactly are your thoughts on why? Why is it that some people often exaggerate beyond it being their own oppinion (as opposed to a real fact) that they somehow [B]must[/B] use things from various books in D&D? I guess I'm so used to running 3.5 where I as DM say these are the books I am using in my campaign, and then listing anything from those books I disallow... that I haven't had the experience of a player showing up with some random, out of nowhere, game element and trying to force it on me. Of course if they did I would just say no or yes depending on my evaluation of it. I must say after reading your second paragraph, I find it strange that (especially with DDI) one of your playershasn't requested the hybrid rules, especially as you've had players who went through DMG 2 and Unearthed Arcana scouring for stuff to use. No need to be sorry, I didn't loose an element I enjoyed... I still have my 3.5 books (and the hybrid rules for 4e). Though I would like to see some more of these elements in 4e. Perhaps the Dark Sun Defiler rules will also be this type of game element. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Ari Marmell's blog] To House Rule or Not to House Rule
Top