Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor & DR... once again. Weapon types
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThomasBJJ" data-source="post: 560706" data-attributes="member: 993"><p>Ok, I still haven't found a system I like for allowing armor to provide Damage Reduction.</p><p></p><p>So, I was thinking to myself that AD&D 1st & 2nd edition had tables where certain types of weapons worked better or worse against certain types of armor.</p><p></p><p>The best example of this was in the 2nd edition PHB...</p><p></p><p>Table 52: Weapon Type vs. Armor Modifiers (Pg. 90)</p><p></p><p>ARMOR TYPE // SLASH/PIERCE/BLUDGEONING</p><p>Banded Mail: +2/+0/+1</p><p>Brigandine::: +1/+1/+0</p><p>Chainmail*:: +2/+0/-2</p><p>Field Plate::: +3/+1/+0</p><p>Full Plate:::: +4/+3/+0</p><p>Leather**:: +0/-2/+0</p><p>Platemail:::: +3/+0/+0</p><p>Ring Mail:::: +1/+1/+0</p><p>Scale Mail::: +0/+1/+0 </p><p>Splint Mail::: +0/+1/+2</p><p>St.Leather:: +2/+1/+0</p><p></p><p>*Includes bronze chainmail</p><p>**Includes padded armor and hides</p><p></p><p>The numbers in the table are added to the attackers THAC0, which means that a positive number means that it is harder for the attacker to hit.</p><p></p><p>I think a good, simple "Armor/DR" system should be limited to Damage Reduction 1, 2, or 3. and leave AC values alone.</p><p></p><p>Converting this table to my simple DR system could look like this:</p><p></p><p>ARMOR // SLASH / PIERCE / BLUDG.</p><p>Light Armor</p><p> -Padded ::::: 0 / 0 / 0 </p><p> -Leather ::::: 0 / 0 / 0 </p><p> -St.Leather :: DR2 / DR1 / 0</p><p> -Chain Shirt : DR2 / 0 / 0</p><p></p><p>Medium Armor</p><p> -Hide ::::::::::: 0 / 0 / 0</p><p> -Scale Mail :::: 0 / DR1 / 0</p><p> -Chainmail :::: DR2 / 0 / 0</p><p> -Breastplate :: DR3 / 0 / 0</p><p> </p><p>Heavy Armor</p><p> -Splint Mail :::: 0 / DR1 / DR2</p><p> -Banded Mail : DR2 / 0 / DR1</p><p> -Half-Plate :::: DR3 / DR1 / 0</p><p> -Full Plate ::::: DR4 / DR3 / 0</p><p></p><p>Now, this is a pretty straight conversion of the table. I would rather not have Full Plate be DR4, but I can live with just that one suit being that tough. I'm not sure I agree with all the other modifiers either. According to the 2nd ed PHB, Leather armor offers NO protection from piercing weapons whatsoever. </p><p></p><p>I'd like for most armor to have at least a DR1 on one of the 3 S/P/B categories, if not more. and probably no armor should have a DR against ALL 3 types.</p><p></p><p>Suggestions and improvements welcomed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThomasBJJ, post: 560706, member: 993"] Ok, I still haven't found a system I like for allowing armor to provide Damage Reduction. So, I was thinking to myself that AD&D 1st & 2nd edition had tables where certain types of weapons worked better or worse against certain types of armor. The best example of this was in the 2nd edition PHB... Table 52: Weapon Type vs. Armor Modifiers (Pg. 90) ARMOR TYPE // SLASH/PIERCE/BLUDGEONING Banded Mail: +2/+0/+1 Brigandine::: +1/+1/+0 Chainmail*:: +2/+0/-2 Field Plate::: +3/+1/+0 Full Plate:::: +4/+3/+0 Leather**:: +0/-2/+0 Platemail:::: +3/+0/+0 Ring Mail:::: +1/+1/+0 Scale Mail::: +0/+1/+0 Splint Mail::: +0/+1/+2 St.Leather:: +2/+1/+0 *Includes bronze chainmail **Includes padded armor and hides The numbers in the table are added to the attackers THAC0, which means that a positive number means that it is harder for the attacker to hit. I think a good, simple "Armor/DR" system should be limited to Damage Reduction 1, 2, or 3. and leave AC values alone. Converting this table to my simple DR system could look like this: ARMOR // SLASH / PIERCE / BLUDG. Light Armor -Padded ::::: 0 / 0 / 0 -Leather ::::: 0 / 0 / 0 -St.Leather :: DR2 / DR1 / 0 -Chain Shirt : DR2 / 0 / 0 Medium Armor -Hide ::::::::::: 0 / 0 / 0 -Scale Mail :::: 0 / DR1 / 0 -Chainmail :::: DR2 / 0 / 0 -Breastplate :: DR3 / 0 / 0 Heavy Armor -Splint Mail :::: 0 / DR1 / DR2 -Banded Mail : DR2 / 0 / DR1 -Half-Plate :::: DR3 / DR1 / 0 -Full Plate ::::: DR4 / DR3 / 0 Now, this is a pretty straight conversion of the table. I would rather not have Full Plate be DR4, but I can live with just that one suit being that tough. I'm not sure I agree with all the other modifiers either. According to the 2nd ed PHB, Leather armor offers NO protection from piercing weapons whatsoever. I'd like for most armor to have at least a DR1 on one of the 3 S/P/B categories, if not more. and probably no armor should have a DR against ALL 3 types. Suggestions and improvements welcomed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor & DR... once again. Weapon types
Top