Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Goumindong" data-source="post: 4776914" data-attributes="member: 70874"><p>No, they are not similar. One is a explicit listing of a powers effects. One is an explicit listing of another ability.</p><p></p><p>We know this RAW because combat challenge is not a single power, its an ability that grants multiple bonuses. Now, if combat challenge were a separate power that was "free action: whenever you attack an enemy you may also mark that enemy, and if that marked enemy does not attack you, or shifts you can make make a melee basic attack as a immediate interrupt against them" then you would have an argument to RAW. But it doesn't, so you don't. </p><p></p><p>We know this RAI because</p><p></p><p>1. Its changed in the compendium</p><p>2. There ability works on all marks created from all targets so long as those marked targets are assigned to the fighter.</p><p></p><p>Look, we've already given you multiple examples of how it works, how similar abilities work, and why they work that way. Either you have some argument other than "nuh uh" or "its too confusing", or "fighters aren't sticky without my rule interpretation", all of which have been thoroughly refuted, or you should stop posting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Anyway, how about another example for good measure. Some items have both properties and powers. If you get hit with a weapon that has both a property and a power, you do not know the specifics of the power even if that power ties into the property of the weapon. Even if that power is an interrupt ability that requires the triggering creature to have been affected with the property.</p><p></p><p>In fact, we can do one better. Lets say someone had a power that let them interrupt an attack against an ally and take all the damage instead. Lets say this power is on a Paladin who is in a party with a fighter and a bard. Lets say the bard marks the baddy for the fighter and then the baddy attacks the bard. The fighter interrupts that ability with his CC and the Paladin interrupt that ability with the CC. What is the difference between the two? A: Nothing, both had a condition imposed, both triggered off the exact same event, both were using separate powers from the mark ability.</p><p></p><p>Now, if you really want to get confusing, in order for your intrepretation to make any sense, you would have to say that:</p><p></p><p>If an enemy is marked by the fighter from a source that is not an attack, then he does not know about combat challenge. If an enemy is marked by the fighter from a source that is an attack from the fighter, then he does know about the combat challenge.</p><p></p><p>Why do we know this? Because the combat challenge apparently only modifies fighter abilities and is not a separate ability[well, besides the fact that it is a separate ability, and its the fighters prime advantage over other defenders]. So now you have to justify two combat challenge abilities in the rules.</p><p></p><p>One that is tied to the attacks and one that isn't. BUT WAIT, it gets worse. The fighter could simply always use the one that wasn't tied to the power, negating your intrepretaiton even if it were true[since the fighter could just avoid it]. BUT WAIT, it gets worse, the fighter could use the marked interrupt ability when he wanted enemies to know he was going to hit them but the other ability when he didn't want enemies to know he was going to hit them! Now the DM has to keep track of marks created by the fighter and marks created by the figthters attacks and marks assigned to the fighter created by someone else, because each one of them has a different rule intrepretation with regards to what the enemy knows.</p><p></p><p>All of that is, of course, ridiculous. If the enemy simply doesn't know what is up until the power is activated, at which point he knows exactly what is up. Exactly as the rules state; there is no confusion. Once the fighter has whacked someone, enemies know that when they're marked by fighter attacks and fighter powers and other powers where the mark is simply assinged to the fighter that the fighter is going to whack them if they don't attack the fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Goumindong, post: 4776914, member: 70874"] No, they are not similar. One is a explicit listing of a powers effects. One is an explicit listing of another ability. We know this RAW because combat challenge is not a single power, its an ability that grants multiple bonuses. Now, if combat challenge were a separate power that was "free action: whenever you attack an enemy you may also mark that enemy, and if that marked enemy does not attack you, or shifts you can make make a melee basic attack as a immediate interrupt against them" then you would have an argument to RAW. But it doesn't, so you don't. We know this RAI because 1. Its changed in the compendium 2. There ability works on all marks created from all targets so long as those marked targets are assigned to the fighter. Look, we've already given you multiple examples of how it works, how similar abilities work, and why they work that way. Either you have some argument other than "nuh uh" or "its too confusing", or "fighters aren't sticky without my rule interpretation", all of which have been thoroughly refuted, or you should stop posting. Anyway, how about another example for good measure. Some items have both properties and powers. If you get hit with a weapon that has both a property and a power, you do not know the specifics of the power even if that power ties into the property of the weapon. Even if that power is an interrupt ability that requires the triggering creature to have been affected with the property. In fact, we can do one better. Lets say someone had a power that let them interrupt an attack against an ally and take all the damage instead. Lets say this power is on a Paladin who is in a party with a fighter and a bard. Lets say the bard marks the baddy for the fighter and then the baddy attacks the bard. The fighter interrupts that ability with his CC and the Paladin interrupt that ability with the CC. What is the difference between the two? A: Nothing, both had a condition imposed, both triggered off the exact same event, both were using separate powers from the mark ability. Now, if you really want to get confusing, in order for your intrepretation to make any sense, you would have to say that: If an enemy is marked by the fighter from a source that is not an attack, then he does not know about combat challenge. If an enemy is marked by the fighter from a source that is an attack from the fighter, then he does know about the combat challenge. Why do we know this? Because the combat challenge apparently only modifies fighter abilities and is not a separate ability[well, besides the fact that it is a separate ability, and its the fighters prime advantage over other defenders]. So now you have to justify two combat challenge abilities in the rules. One that is tied to the attacks and one that isn't. BUT WAIT, it gets worse. The fighter could simply always use the one that wasn't tied to the power, negating your intrepretaiton even if it were true[since the fighter could just avoid it]. BUT WAIT, it gets worse, the fighter could use the marked interrupt ability when he wanted enemies to know he was going to hit them but the other ability when he didn't want enemies to know he was going to hit them! Now the DM has to keep track of marks created by the fighter and marks created by the figthters attacks and marks assigned to the fighter created by someone else, because each one of them has a different rule intrepretation with regards to what the enemy knows. All of that is, of course, ridiculous. If the enemy simply doesn't know what is up until the power is activated, at which point he knows exactly what is up. Exactly as the rules state; there is no confusion. Once the fighter has whacked someone, enemies know that when they're marked by fighter attacks and fighter powers and other powers where the mark is simply assinged to the fighter that the fighter is going to whack them if they don't attack the fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
Top