Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4776994" data-attributes="member: 2011">No, we know nothing of the sort.That is an interpretation. If you cannot comprehend that there is no explicit rule here that states "Combat Challenge is an exception to the monster knowledge rule", then it is not worth discussing this.I totally understand where you are coming from. But, you are talking as if it is fact and written and stone and it's not. There is no rule that explicitly states what you are stating. There is an interpretation that supports your POV, just like there is one that supports mine.If you cannot see that, then shrug...If you are using the word "power" in the actual rule ("Whenever you affect a creature with a power, that creature knows exactly what you’ve done to it and what conditions you’ve imposed") to differentiate, then the monster does not even know it is marked by the Fighter because CC is not a power that affects the creature.This is the only monster knowledge rule we have. If some other rule does not explicitly (i.e. in other words, states that it does so in non-ambiguous terms) override it, then this rule takes precedence.CC does not explicitly override this. To have it do so is an interpretation, not RAW.I would have to say nothing of the sort.Btw, this is called a strawman argument. Trying to disprove my position by attempting to disprove some other position that I have not claimed is a logical fallicy.</blockquote>