Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 4778034" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>And the wizard hits 3+ targets and sustains another multi-target effect.</p><p></p><p>Actually you can. Your goal is to reduce all opposing characters to zero hitpoints before they reduce you and your allies to zero.</p><p></p><p>You're well within rights to say "if I lose 1/2 of a guy, but kill one of their guys, that's better than if I kill 1/4 of their guys.", which is pretty much exactly what I'm saying.</p><p></p><p>Theres many variables being ignored here because they're simply too complex, and this is just one of them. Even if we assume that every single heal comes from a power with bonuses, the numbers don't shift that much.</p><p></p><p>Yes, you're absolutely right. So the formula for whomever you've marked shifts even further in favour of ignoring you and just attacking the current focus target.</p><p></p><p>Ah, so you're saying that the defender's job is simply to take up a square on the battlefield, and that pretty much covers it?</p><p></p><p>Sure you are: you just did it above. You're simply stating "well, my tactic X defeats your tactic Y" without actually doing the simulation yourself. What actually happens is that splitting fire leads to your foes causing more damage on any one target than them both focussing on you.</p><p></p><p>Please feel free to support this with... well... anything.</p><p></p><p>First, you're lowballing the DPR.</p><p></p><p>Second, I never made any of the builds I suggested.</p><p></p><p>Third, fighters are not currently kings of DPR: they're merely up there.</p><p></p><p>Finally: We're comparing against a wizard, and fighters lose their DPR king status once there's a second target available.</p><p></p><p>Did you just not read the entire thing? Yes, you're a very high AC fighter - and part of the point of the exercise is that this is a bad idea.</p><p></p><p>How is the wizard ridiculously low AC? He's close to his attribute maximum, and hasn't done anything to boost it, sure, but his AC is far from ridiculously low. Ridiculously low would be if I'd chosen a warlock or melee ranger.</p><p></p><p>And what makes you "moderately optimised for combat challenge"? You've got 50% of your feats boosting it, and a wisdom in the region of 16+, at a guess. How much more could you do to boost it?</p><p></p><p>The fighter was able to make attacking the wizard a close thing, but as you've pointed out, focus fire has a certain amount of value. So if that hobgoblin has any artillery buddies, he's still going to ignore you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 4778034, member: 5890"] And the wizard hits 3+ targets and sustains another multi-target effect. Actually you can. Your goal is to reduce all opposing characters to zero hitpoints before they reduce you and your allies to zero. You're well within rights to say "if I lose 1/2 of a guy, but kill one of their guys, that's better than if I kill 1/4 of their guys.", which is pretty much exactly what I'm saying. Theres many variables being ignored here because they're simply too complex, and this is just one of them. Even if we assume that every single heal comes from a power with bonuses, the numbers don't shift that much. Yes, you're absolutely right. So the formula for whomever you've marked shifts even further in favour of ignoring you and just attacking the current focus target. Ah, so you're saying that the defender's job is simply to take up a square on the battlefield, and that pretty much covers it? Sure you are: you just did it above. You're simply stating "well, my tactic X defeats your tactic Y" without actually doing the simulation yourself. What actually happens is that splitting fire leads to your foes causing more damage on any one target than them both focussing on you. Please feel free to support this with... well... anything. First, you're lowballing the DPR. Second, I never made any of the builds I suggested. Third, fighters are not currently kings of DPR: they're merely up there. Finally: We're comparing against a wizard, and fighters lose their DPR king status once there's a second target available. Did you just not read the entire thing? Yes, you're a very high AC fighter - and part of the point of the exercise is that this is a bad idea. How is the wizard ridiculously low AC? He's close to his attribute maximum, and hasn't done anything to boost it, sure, but his AC is far from ridiculously low. Ridiculously low would be if I'd chosen a warlock or melee ranger. And what makes you "moderately optimised for combat challenge"? You've got 50% of your feats boosting it, and a wisdom in the region of 16+, at a guess. How much more could you do to boost it? The fighter was able to make attacking the wizard a close thing, but as you've pointed out, focus fire has a certain amount of value. So if that hobgoblin has any artillery buddies, he's still going to ignore you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
Top