Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4781206" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Actually, CC has not been used, but it has been activated as long as the Fighter has a mark. CC (as written in the PHB) is not just the mark, it is also the interrupt. When the Bard gives the Fighter the mark, he also allows the Fighter's CC to work and hence, the monster knows about it.</p><p></p><p>You view CC as two different abilities. I view it as the rules for one ability.</p><p></p><p>This is not a contradiction to the rules. This is a different interpretation of the rules.</p><p></p><p>No matter how you spin it, my interpretation is consistent within itself just like your interpretation is consistent within itself. But neither interpretation has to be consistent within the other interpretation and that is where your logic here is flawed. You are trying to force inconsistencies derived from viewing the rules within the narrow rose colored glasses of your interpretation onto my interpretation.</p><p></p><p>If you refuse to see the differences between the interpretations here, there is nothing I can do about it. You will always think that my interpretation is flawed, just because it is not your interpretation because your interpretation colors how you view the rules. You appear to not be seeing the big picture of either interpretation and how the rules work for both.</p><p></p><p>The rules work fine for both. They just work slightly differently. Either interpretation is firmly within the framework of RAW, they just have a different "rules as interpreted".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4781206, member: 2011"] Actually, CC has not been used, but it has been activated as long as the Fighter has a mark. CC (as written in the PHB) is not just the mark, it is also the interrupt. When the Bard gives the Fighter the mark, he also allows the Fighter's CC to work and hence, the monster knows about it. You view CC as two different abilities. I view it as the rules for one ability. This is not a contradiction to the rules. This is a different interpretation of the rules. No matter how you spin it, my interpretation is consistent within itself just like your interpretation is consistent within itself. But neither interpretation has to be consistent within the other interpretation and that is where your logic here is flawed. You are trying to force inconsistencies derived from viewing the rules within the narrow rose colored glasses of your interpretation onto my interpretation. If you refuse to see the differences between the interpretations here, there is nothing I can do about it. You will always think that my interpretation is flawed, just because it is not your interpretation because your interpretation colors how you view the rules. You appear to not be seeing the big picture of either interpretation and how the rules work for both. The rules work fine for both. They just work slightly differently. Either interpretation is firmly within the framework of RAW, they just have a different "rules as interpreted". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armor Specialization (Plate)
Top