Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armors: Getting hit vs Damage reduction
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gorgoroth" data-source="post: 5861473" data-attributes="member: 6674889"><p><strong>DR seems to be all or nothing</strong></p><p></p><p>Either they bake it into the system from the start, in Core, or they drop it. I hope it makes it in there, as DR is already used by many monsters, largely to make up for their crappy AC oftentimes that fighters can easily hit anyway.</p><p></p><p>A rogue with 18 Dex and leather = 17 AC, is not the same as a fighter with 16 dex and scale armor = 17 AC, because leather has higher movement speed, less penalties, and having higher Dex gives you better initiative, higher reflex, and so on.</p><p></p><p>Why not make Reflex like the old AC stat, and similar to touch AC, and AC is just a DR value based on the type. Forget weapon types vs AC, that does get too complicated IMO (though as an optional module for those simulationists, heck yes). Actually, I'd like a balanced armor / defense system (i.e. not favoring Dex-is-god like 4e does), that incorporates DR as an optional system, but where they took the time and did the math. Or as a an optional book entirely. But plan is from the start, to interact with the rest of the flat math progression. I don't see why DR vs melee weapons or spells can't be variable, in this optional system. Even vs weapons, if you like that type of simulationism. At the very least, having high AC vs puny goblins where they can only hurt you on a crit means it will indeed be the heavy fighter wading through them. The rogue's sneak attack damage should add enough to his total to affect the heavily armored guard well enough, and he should have some abilities to have a high crit range when his opponents are not aware of him. This gives a classic rogue feel while allowing fighters in heavy armor to not feel like they spent all that money and effort to have the same defenses as the lightly armored rogue. 4e system = not realistic, at all. It's more complicated, and in exchange ended up being less realistic at the same time. </p><p></p><p>That's what I call a lose-lose. Most uber defense builds in 4e do not use plate armor. That's broken, IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gorgoroth, post: 5861473, member: 6674889"] [b]DR seems to be all or nothing[/b] Either they bake it into the system from the start, in Core, or they drop it. I hope it makes it in there, as DR is already used by many monsters, largely to make up for their crappy AC oftentimes that fighters can easily hit anyway. A rogue with 18 Dex and leather = 17 AC, is not the same as a fighter with 16 dex and scale armor = 17 AC, because leather has higher movement speed, less penalties, and having higher Dex gives you better initiative, higher reflex, and so on. Why not make Reflex like the old AC stat, and similar to touch AC, and AC is just a DR value based on the type. Forget weapon types vs AC, that does get too complicated IMO (though as an optional module for those simulationists, heck yes). Actually, I'd like a balanced armor / defense system (i.e. not favoring Dex-is-god like 4e does), that incorporates DR as an optional system, but where they took the time and did the math. Or as a an optional book entirely. But plan is from the start, to interact with the rest of the flat math progression. I don't see why DR vs melee weapons or spells can't be variable, in this optional system. Even vs weapons, if you like that type of simulationism. At the very least, having high AC vs puny goblins where they can only hurt you on a crit means it will indeed be the heavy fighter wading through them. The rogue's sneak attack damage should add enough to his total to affect the heavily armored guard well enough, and he should have some abilities to have a high crit range when his opponents are not aware of him. This gives a classic rogue feel while allowing fighters in heavy armor to not feel like they spent all that money and effort to have the same defenses as the lightly armored rogue. 4e system = not realistic, at all. It's more complicated, and in exchange ended up being less realistic at the same time. That's what I call a lose-lose. Most uber defense builds in 4e do not use plate armor. That's broken, IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Armors: Getting hit vs Damage reduction
Top