Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Armour Bonus Stacking and Rings of Protection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="W'rkncacnter" data-source="post: 8915805" data-attributes="member: 7033455"><p>the bracers of defense specifically say you gain the bonus to AC "if you are wearing no armor and using no shield". i'd say that's pretty specific. barbarians and monks have unarmoured defense, meaning their AC calculation changes specifically when they do not wear armor - there's no reason why this feature would disallow you from wearing bracers of defense. </p><p></p><p>mage armor also only works on a creature not wearing armor, and RAW only gives you a different AC calculation, meaning RAW it's not actually armor.</p><p></p><p>this is wrong - most features and spells that determine an AC give you an <em>alternate AC calculation. </em>the base AC calculation is 10+Dexterity, most armors give you an AC calculation either #+Dexterity, #+Dexterity (maximum 2), or just # (depending on if it's light, medium, or heavy armor respectively), mage armor gives you an AC calculation of 13+Dexterity, etc. however, there are features that just give bonuses to AC, like shield of faith or the bracers of defense - these are stacked on top of your AC calculation. if AC worked the way you said it would, shield of faith and bracers of defense would be literally worthless, because everyone has a default AC calculation they wouldn't work with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="W'rkncacnter, post: 8915805, member: 7033455"] the bracers of defense specifically say you gain the bonus to AC "if you are wearing no armor and using no shield". i'd say that's pretty specific. barbarians and monks have unarmoured defense, meaning their AC calculation changes specifically when they do not wear armor - there's no reason why this feature would disallow you from wearing bracers of defense. mage armor also only works on a creature not wearing armor, and RAW only gives you a different AC calculation, meaning RAW it's not actually armor. this is wrong - most features and spells that determine an AC give you an [I]alternate AC calculation. [/I]the base AC calculation is 10+Dexterity, most armors give you an AC calculation either #+Dexterity, #+Dexterity (maximum 2), or just # (depending on if it's light, medium, or heavy armor respectively), mage armor gives you an AC calculation of 13+Dexterity, etc. however, there are features that just give bonuses to AC, like shield of faith or the bracers of defense - these are stacked on top of your AC calculation. if AC worked the way you said it would, shield of faith and bracers of defense would be literally worthless, because everyone has a default AC calculation they wouldn't work with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Armour Bonus Stacking and Rings of Protection
Top