Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NPC" data-source="post: 923409" data-attributes="member: 7124">This will never end . . .I realize Fus saw the underlying difference and posted a poll to talk about it, but it didn't click with me until I heard how how Tsyr and mmu1 would have handled the situation.I'm not making a value judgment here, just summarizing.Tsyr and mmu1 have basically admitted that they would fudge the rules for the betterment of the game, so that everyone has fun.Fus follows the rules very closely, for better or for worse.These two DMing philosophies will never meet.&nbsp; Both philosphies are valid and can make for a great game.So the point-counter point could probably go on forever.&nbsp; So I'll throw a question out there.What general statement about the encounter would all parties be willing to agree to?&nbsp; We see so much disagreement on the boards, I'd be interested to see if any common ground can be found.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NPC, post: 923409, member: 7124"] [b]This will never end . . .[/b] I realize Fus saw the underlying difference and posted a poll to talk about it, but it didn't click with me until I heard how how Tsyr and mmu1 would have handled the situation. I'm not making a value judgment here, just summarizing. Tsyr and mmu1 have basically admitted that they would fudge the rules for the betterment of the game, so that everyone has fun. Fus follows the rules very closely, for better or for worse. These two DMing philosophies will never meet. Both philosphies are valid and can make for a great game. So the point-counter point could probably go on forever. So I'll throw a question out there. What general statement about the encounter would all parties be willing to agree to? We see so much disagreement on the boards, I'd be interested to see if any common ground can be found. [/QUOTE]

Verification