Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wayside" data-source="post: 927355" data-attributes="member: 8394">Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ?Frankly, your actual quotes can be confusing.  But what's more important, the way to point out bad reasoning is to break it down into propositions and get rid of the rhetoric.  However, the question was 'what's with the attitude?' so in this case my response was 'I dunno, you tell me,' hence I left the pertinent rhetoric in, because that's where the bad attitude originated.  The fact that you only mention the top of my two examples speaks volumes.But since you didn't actually give any reasons in your post in any case, I have no idea why I bothered to say all of that.  That's right, no reasons.  You just restated your position.  You know, the one you thought I missed.  It's a fine, valid position though.  Players should have fun.  Word.(Another minor point:  just now, you didn't actually give reasons why my statements are 'wrong' either.  That's more of that bad attitude thing.  An argument can be made from your statement, but obviously I don't want to attribute something to you you didn't actually say.  You do imply that I don't quote you directly because my comments are disingenuous, which is funny.  If you request I can go do that when I have a moment, and arrange what I posted before using your actual words in what will I'm sure be a humorously absurd display of contradiction.  Well, there were only the two examples, so it might be a little thin, but I could always comb the thread for more.) Yes, it does say that.  However you indicated that the length of the thread was proof of that wrong.  The reasonable reply to this assertion is to get the facts of the thread straight, whatever they may be.  So don't hold his being reasonable against him.I say it to you because, unless my memory has lapsed, you were the one that made the initial comment.  I say it seems to annoy you because it has been brought up repeatedly, most often as somehow being indicative of Fusangite's arrogance.  Like I said before, there has been a tendency to criticize him for successfully defending himself against a number of attacks.  His rebuffs are  reinterpreted by his critics as his being haughty, which just isn't fair.I don't see a right or a wrong here either.  I don't think Fusangite did anything wrong, but I don't think any of the suggestions are bad.  We have that potential solution in common, but really, my solution to his dilemma would be to find new players, because that reaction is just jank.  It wouldn't work with my group at all.  And that's really the question: what works with his group?  As it turns out, exactly what he did.  He gives reasons why some other suggestions would not work for him.  They may seem off-key, but that's his group.</blockquote>

Verification