Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Army's new mobile laser can shoot down mortar rounds.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tarchon" data-source="post: 1728799" data-attributes="member: 5990"><p>I actually work in the field, so my guesses have some substantial basis. A "critical reader" would understand that a press release conventionally doesn't contain a lot of technical details, many of which are either proprietary or classified to begin with. I happen to know that steering a laser beam and tracking a mortar with radar are much easier to do than precisely directing a mortar into the beam of a pulsed laser, so I ASSUME that they probably did the easiest thing, it being a bench test and all. Really, this is mostly a "feel good" test IMO - all the components are known to be workable anyway. Now a truly critical view of this technology looks not at the sensing system but at the semi-tractor trailer that carries the apparatus around. They won't be putting this in a backpack anytime soon.</p><p>If you really must know exactly how they did the tracking, rather than complain about what uncritical dufuses we are, I would suggest you google MTHEL and find <a href="http://www.st.northropgrumman.com/media/SiteFiles/mediagallery/factsheet/SPIE_Manuscript_Tactical_high-energy_laser.pdf" target="_blank">relevant papers</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tarchon, post: 1728799, member: 5990"] I actually work in the field, so my guesses have some substantial basis. A "critical reader" would understand that a press release conventionally doesn't contain a lot of technical details, many of which are either proprietary or classified to begin with. I happen to know that steering a laser beam and tracking a mortar with radar are much easier to do than precisely directing a mortar into the beam of a pulsed laser, so I ASSUME that they probably did the easiest thing, it being a bench test and all. Really, this is mostly a "feel good" test IMO - all the components are known to be workable anyway. Now a truly critical view of this technology looks not at the sensing system but at the semi-tractor trailer that carries the apparatus around. They won't be putting this in a backpack anytime soon. If you really must know exactly how they did the tracking, rather than complain about what uncritical dufuses we are, I would suggest you google MTHEL and find [URL=http://www.st.northropgrumman.com/media/SiteFiles/mediagallery/factsheet/SPIE_Manuscript_Tactical_high-energy_laser.pdf]relevant papers[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Army's new mobile laser can shoot down mortar rounds.
Top