Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GMforPowergamers" data-source="post: 6626591" data-attributes="member: 67338">you ignore the entire point... that you need to look at it from other points of view and that your senerio (only 1 person out of 5, 6 or 7 sees the imbalance) is far from the only scenero... you ingonred the entire point. if they agree... funny how you cut out the 'talk about it and brain strom' part and they rip apart the idea... almost like you don't want to deal with the scenario  wait... playing with lower stats is punishment... I thought your whole argument went against that... yes I even went on to explain when I was the player in question unbalanceing the game my first thought was to fix it at my end (the higher power) but again you ignored that to focus on a narrative where I am the bad guy... instead of looking at he whole post where I was talking comprmise and adult conversation... that was actually me stealing that idea from someone on your side of the argument I just made it the belt instead of a +X sword... someone on your side argueing for rolling a page or two back said ifyou didn't complain (although how you communicate a problem without stating it still goes over my head) he would give you better magic items...unless the whole group saw the same problem...so my fighter hears a legend about a dungeon with a set of mits that make me as strong as a giant... I have to go multi games (still not having fun) to get to them, and then when we get there, the cleric could still take the gauntlets of str +6... and have a bigger advantage.... um how is that at all fair? it sounds like you wouldn't try to help at alledit: what you ignoredso since you will only talk about if 1 out of your players has a problem, you are ignoreing this whole ideathe whole argument ocmes down to you not beliving the complaint to begin with... so maybe this shouldn't be ignored///this was me addressing you saying the complaint had no merit... but you never answered how you know if it did or not, and what you do when it does have merit...  ignoreing multi examples of how things were handled... including when the more powerful character agreed there was a problem....  and of course anything that is a discussion of handling thing reasonable got cut why again....</blockquote>

Verification