Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Fist" data-source="post: 485900" data-attributes="member: 2346">8007gp for one spell storing arrow is a bit much.You could buy an arrow of slaying for a little more than a grand.Given that there is a breakage chance on a miss, and after fifty, you're done, its seems fairly as valuable as a weapon you could effectively use a few times a day (my Ftr/Rog/Sor Spellsword used his s-s greatsword several times a day) and never ran out.Granted, the fact that my archer &quot;can&quot; fire multiple times in a round sets my munchkin alarm off.Maybe only allowing one arrow per bunch to be able to hold a spell at one time would be more balanced (it's my fallback if my DM disallows the original plan).On another note:&nbsp; a giant arrow affected by &quot;shrink item&quot; should have no problem causing damage when it expands upon hitting.&nbsp; The creature and the cage example doesn't apply, because the cage is still broken by the enlarged creature (and this is a third level spell, not a first).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Fist, post: 485900, member: 2346"] 8007gp for one spell storing arrow is a bit much. You could buy an arrow of slaying for a little more than a grand. Given that there is a breakage chance on a miss, and after fifty, you're done, its seems fairly as valuable as a weapon you could effectively use a few times a day (my Ftr/Rog/Sor Spellsword used his s-s greatsword several times a day) and never ran out. Granted, the fact that my archer "can" fire multiple times in a round sets my munchkin alarm off. Maybe only allowing one arrow per bunch to be able to hold a spell at one time would be more balanced (it's my fallback if my DM disallows the original plan). On another note: a giant arrow affected by "shrink item" should have no problem causing damage when it expands upon hitting. The creature and the cage example doesn't apply, because the cage is still broken by the enlarged creature (and this is a third level spell, not a first). [/QUOTE]

Verification