Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TwoSix" data-source="post: 7769452" data-attributes="member: 205">Just to address the complexity issue, which the creator mentions in the <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/UnearthedArcana/comments/adbpdg/5e_revised_artificer_v161_expanded_toolbox_v12/" target="_blank">Reddit post</a>:&quot;The most common criticism I get is that the class is too complicated. I think this is probably true, but I don't think it is worth simplifying - and let me explain what I mean by that. The people that are going out to go find an Homebrew Artificer are looking for a class that has actual depth, so it is better served in having depth than being as 5e compliant as possible in terms of streamlining. If I was writing the new WotC version, I'd make cuts I wouldn't make to my Homebrew version... but probably not as many as I expect WotC to make.&quot;That being said, a lot of us like our crunch to be actually crunchy.&nbsp; Fitting 3 or 4 subclasses across 2 pages is too sleek for my tastes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TwoSix, post: 7769452, member: 205"] Just to address the complexity issue, which the creator mentions in the [URL="https://www.reddit.com/r/UnearthedArcana/comments/adbpdg/5e_revised_artificer_v161_expanded_toolbox_v12/"]Reddit post[/URL]: "The most common criticism I get is that the class is too complicated. I think this is probably true, but I don't think it is worth simplifying - and let me explain what I mean by that. The people that are going out to go find an Homebrew Artificer are looking for a class that has actual depth, so it is better served in having depth than being as 5e compliant as possible in terms of streamlining. If I was writing the new WotC version, I'd make cuts I wouldn't make to my Homebrew version... but probably not as many as I expect WotC to make." That being said, a lot of us like our crunch to be actually crunchy. Fitting 3 or 4 subclasses across 2 pages is [I]too[/I] sleek for my tastes. [/QUOTE]

Verification