Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 7772146" data-attributes="member: 2525">Nobody has ever, in the history of this message board, ever once even vaguely hinted for a moment that you do not have the &quot;right&quot; to complain about this topic. Many however have said they disagree with your opinion on this topic. A fact which you seem to struggle with.Your characterization of his dissenting opinion from yours as &quot;riduclous&quot; is itself ridiculous. I say again, the evidence you've received on this message board concerning this opinion of yours is that your view is NOT WELL SHARED. The overwhelming majority of responses you've gotten on this topic is disagreement with your view. There is nothing inherantly wrong with you having a view that is not well shared, however your constnt characterization of that contrary majority view as &quot;ridiculous&quot; and other perjoratives is what people object to. From you, and almost only you. The number of people who share your view are such a small fraction of the number of views expressed on this message board about this topic that every time you raise this view and go off like this, the only rational message it would send to WOTC (if they were reading any of this - which they are not) is that they're doing the right thing. Because your view is so not well shared here. All you're doing by behaving this way is sending up a red flare for them to see all the people who disagree with you, who deeply outnumber those who agree with you. It's almost like you're engaging in a false flag. If you actually loved the way WOTC had behaved so far, and you wanted to send that message to WOTC, I suppose one way to do it would be to do what you've been doing - behave so outrageously the other direction that you get people to post their disagreement where they otherwise might have remained silent.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 7772146, member: 2525"] Nobody has ever, in the history of this message board, ever once even vaguely hinted for a moment that you do not have the "right" to complain about this topic. Many however have said they disagree with your opinion on this topic. A fact which you seem to struggle with. Your characterization of his dissenting opinion from yours as "riduclous" is itself ridiculous. I say again, the evidence you've received on this message board concerning this opinion of yours is that your view is NOT WELL SHARED. The overwhelming majority of responses you've gotten on this topic is disagreement with your view. There is nothing inherantly wrong with you having a view that is not well shared, however your constnt characterization of that contrary majority view as "ridiculous" and other perjoratives is what people object to. From you, and almost only you. The number of people who share your view are such a small fraction of the number of views expressed on this message board about this topic that every time you raise this view and go off like this, the only rational message it would send to WOTC (if they were reading any of this - which they are not) is that they're doing the right thing. Because your view is so not well shared here. All you're doing by behaving this way is sending up a red flare for them to see all the people who disagree with you, who deeply outnumber those who agree with you. It's almost like you're engaging in a false flag. If you actually loved the way WOTC had behaved so far, and you wanted to send that message to WOTC, I suppose one way to do it would be to do what you've been doing - behave so outrageously the other direction that you get people to post their disagreement where they otherwise might have remained silent. [/QUOTE]

Verification