Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arwend -- Social Class Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolv0rine" data-source="post: 3361535" data-attributes="member: 9045"><p>1) Well, there are really only 3 reasons I cas honestly think of to take teh Poor or Middle Class feats:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"></li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For the skill bonues that comes with them</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">To have a better chance of getting along with the everyday people one should often be likely to be walking among, especially at lower levels</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">For Role-Play reasons</li> </ul><p></p><p>2) Currently there's nothing to keep everyone from doing just that, DM adjucation aside. That's why the note in there wonders if the higher class feats should require multiple feat slots.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm, the biggest problems I can see with that system are;</p><p>1) 'Influence' as a name implies something one supposes that PCs will aquire as they adventure (Influence, as opposed to connections be they monetary or political). Granted this is very minor.</p><p>2) This assumes that those with levels in the Aristocrat class aren't pompus arses (while I wouldn't imply they should all be, or even most, some inevitably are, and it looks like this system eliminates that possibility by giving them all influence boosts by merit of their levels). Again, this isn't huge.</p><p></p><p>It's not a bad system you've got working, it's simple and obviously gets done what you want it to do. What you want it to do isn't exactly what this system is trying to accomplish though (although it does brush against some of it).</p><p></p><p>I am looking for ways to push players toward the lower end, of course, because everyone can't be royalty. And if they can't swing (or can't justify the expense of) the higher Social Class feats and don't want to go for the lower class feats, there is that section that says that any character without a SC feat automatically falls into Middle Class. I figured that was marginally fair to give if someone didn't want to blow a feat, but I wanted the system to be in use. But yes, I do want to find a good way that fits in to make the higher SC feats less accessable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolv0rine, post: 3361535, member: 9045"] 1) Well, there are really only 3 reasons I cas honestly think of to take teh Poor or Middle Class feats: [list] [/list] [list=a] [*]For the skill bonues that comes with them [*]To have a better chance of getting along with the everyday people one should often be likely to be walking among, especially at lower levels [*]For Role-Play reasons [/list] 2) Currently there's nothing to keep everyone from doing just that, DM adjucation aside. That's why the note in there wonders if the higher class feats should require multiple feat slots. Hmm, the biggest problems I can see with that system are; 1) 'Influence' as a name implies something one supposes that PCs will aquire as they adventure (Influence, as opposed to connections be they monetary or political). Granted this is very minor. 2) This assumes that those with levels in the Aristocrat class aren't pompus arses (while I wouldn't imply they should all be, or even most, some inevitably are, and it looks like this system eliminates that possibility by giving them all influence boosts by merit of their levels). Again, this isn't huge. It's not a bad system you've got working, it's simple and obviously gets done what you want it to do. What you want it to do isn't exactly what this system is trying to accomplish though (although it does brush against some of it). I am looking for ways to push players toward the lower end, of course, because everyone can't be royalty. And if they can't swing (or can't justify the expense of) the higher Social Class feats and don't want to go for the lower class feats, there is that section that says that any character without a SC feat automatically falls into Middle Class. I figured that was marginally fair to give if someone didn't want to blow a feat, but I wanted the system to be in use. But yes, I do want to find a good way that fits in to make the higher SC feats less accessable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Arwend -- Social Class Rules
Top