Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Coroc" data-source="post: 7872308" data-attributes="member: 6895991">Two can be averted, either by not allowing the spell or it malfunctions for some reason, or the destination changes.&nbsp; That is fair use of rule zero in your specific example imho.But your banishment / divination wizard combo, I tell you that is a beast. That is real game mastery - by your players. In that case I would give them the victory and an inspiration on top for the wizard.The second example compared to that is just boring, but one reason more why I really make teleport / fly availability etc. setting dependent.But how could you circumvent the banishment thing if you wanted to? One solution would be to have the balor already been in action and gating in some more devils, I think he could do that. Then his support troops would agro the most helpless population. Everyone not first stopping them (waisting the banishment divinations)&nbsp; is in for an alignment change.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Coroc, post: 7872308, member: 6895991"] Two can be averted, either by not allowing the spell or it malfunctions for some reason, or the destination changes. That is fair use of rule zero in your specific example imho. But your banishment / divination wizard combo, I tell you that is a beast. That is real game mastery - by your players. In that case I would give them the victory and an inspiration on top for the wizard. The second example compared to that is just boring, but one reason more why I really make teleport / fly availability etc. setting dependent. But how could you circumvent the banishment thing if you wanted to? One solution would be to have the balor already been in action and gating in some more devils, I think he could do that. Then his support troops would agro the most helpless population. Everyone not first stopping them (waisting the banishment divinations) is in for an alignment change. [/QUOTE]

Verification