Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
As a Player, why do you play in games you haven't bought into?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="oreofox" data-source="post: 8120901" data-attributes="member: 6776240"><p>A good player is one that will make their character fit a theme of what the DM is trying to run. A DM running War of the Lance that says "you can play whatever, but certain classes will have certain problems in the setting", and the players come out with a warlock, sorcerer, cleric, paladin, and bard is fine. The DM didn't say "you can't play those classes." But if a DM says they are running War of the Lance as close to the original telling (no clerics, sorcerers and warlocks aren't available), and the players come with those classes, those are problem players.</p><p></p><p>This argument has been beaten to death so badly it doesn't resemble a horse, or even a pile of goo. There are certain people who feel the players can do no wrong and the DM is a horrible controlling POS if he doesn't dance to the whims of the players. There are certain people who feel the DM is under no obligation to do anything the players want and they should dance to his whims. We've had this argument numerous times.</p><p></p><p>A DM who sets restrictions on what is allowed, isn't a bad DM trying to force his novel onto his players. A DM isn't only a "good DM" if they throw out what they had planned because her players agreed to play and then made characters that don't fit. The act of compromise isn't just on the DM. Players must compromise as well. A good DM is one that has guidelines set up for a campaign, and good players make their characters conform to those guidelines. That same good DM will make changes if a player makes something unexpected, but still within the guidelines. D&D isn't just for the players to have fun. The DM gets to have fun as well. And if the players want to play something that the DM doesn't find fun, then it looks like they need to find a different DM. If the DM wants to run something the players don't find fun, then they need new players. But if the DM wants to run something they find fun, and the majority of players find fun but one doesn't, that one can sit out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="oreofox, post: 8120901, member: 6776240"] A good player is one that will make their character fit a theme of what the DM is trying to run. A DM running War of the Lance that says "you can play whatever, but certain classes will have certain problems in the setting", and the players come out with a warlock, sorcerer, cleric, paladin, and bard is fine. The DM didn't say "you can't play those classes." But if a DM says they are running War of the Lance as close to the original telling (no clerics, sorcerers and warlocks aren't available), and the players come with those classes, those are problem players. This argument has been beaten to death so badly it doesn't resemble a horse, or even a pile of goo. There are certain people who feel the players can do no wrong and the DM is a horrible controlling POS if he doesn't dance to the whims of the players. There are certain people who feel the DM is under no obligation to do anything the players want and they should dance to his whims. We've had this argument numerous times. A DM who sets restrictions on what is allowed, isn't a bad DM trying to force his novel onto his players. A DM isn't only a "good DM" if they throw out what they had planned because her players agreed to play and then made characters that don't fit. The act of compromise isn't just on the DM. Players must compromise as well. A good DM is one that has guidelines set up for a campaign, and good players make their characters conform to those guidelines. That same good DM will make changes if a player makes something unexpected, but still within the guidelines. D&D isn't just for the players to have fun. The DM gets to have fun as well. And if the players want to play something that the DM doesn't find fun, then it looks like they need to find a different DM. If the DM wants to run something the players don't find fun, then they need new players. But if the DM wants to run something they find fun, and the majority of players find fun but one doesn't, that one can sit out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
As a Player, why do you play in games you haven't bought into?
Top