Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
As a Player, why do you play in games you haven't bought into?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8122155" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Creating the exact same characters during session zero would be worse, honestly. At that point, you've made a more conscious decision to completely ignore the hooks the GM is offering into the setting and adventure than if you just do it beforehand. </p><p></p><p>I feel there's some additional information hiding in the gaps here. When you say you discussed the characters and the GM was present, what format was this in? Was it after a session online, or in chat, or some other social media? How involved was the GM in your character discussion -- so far we have you saying the GM was present and the GM saying they explicitly said (and you've acknowledged) to not make characters prior to session zero. Right now, it really reads like you're trying to use the GM's presence during pre-session zero discussion to justify completely ignoring the instructions on character generation. And, now, you're presenting an argument that the exact same characters would have been created during session zero even if there had been no pre-session discussion or planning. I can even understand this last argument -- it makes no sense to me. You're saying that all the players would have done exactly the same thing even if they had no pre-conceived concepts and had played the planned character creation mini-game. That suggests that it wouldn't matter to the players what was being presented in any way -- they'd still just do whatever they wanted. Which is the actual point of the thread -- why indicate you've bought into a concept if you're going to ignore it?</p><p></p><p>Further, you've indicated that you'd actually read the adventure setting. Yet, you still created a character that had no connection to that setting and then stated you became dissatisfied because your background -- again, unrelated to the adventure or adventure setting -- had not been made important by the GM. This is, again, directly in line with the OP complaint.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 8122155, member: 16814"] Creating the exact same characters during session zero would be worse, honestly. At that point, you've made a more conscious decision to completely ignore the hooks the GM is offering into the setting and adventure than if you just do it beforehand. I feel there's some additional information hiding in the gaps here. When you say you discussed the characters and the GM was present, what format was this in? Was it after a session online, or in chat, or some other social media? How involved was the GM in your character discussion -- so far we have you saying the GM was present and the GM saying they explicitly said (and you've acknowledged) to not make characters prior to session zero. Right now, it really reads like you're trying to use the GM's presence during pre-session zero discussion to justify completely ignoring the instructions on character generation. And, now, you're presenting an argument that the exact same characters would have been created during session zero even if there had been no pre-session discussion or planning. I can even understand this last argument -- it makes no sense to me. You're saying that all the players would have done exactly the same thing even if they had no pre-conceived concepts and had played the planned character creation mini-game. That suggests that it wouldn't matter to the players what was being presented in any way -- they'd still just do whatever they wanted. Which is the actual point of the thread -- why indicate you've bought into a concept if you're going to ignore it? Further, you've indicated that you'd actually read the adventure setting. Yet, you still created a character that had no connection to that setting and then stated you became dissatisfied because your background -- again, unrelated to the adventure or adventure setting -- had not been made important by the GM. This is, again, directly in line with the OP complaint. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
As a Player, why do you play in games you haven't bought into?
Top