Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kreaf" data-source="post: 4528408" data-attributes="member: 74278">Thanks for your reply.Your are right. I quarreld with my self over that point for quite a bit. Maybe I could just switch it. English names into the powers, homebrew names into the footnotes. What do you think?Thanks again. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Done. Is 5 points of damage to much/less?Good idea. It also makes more sense this way. (Fluff wise)At the moment its a free action to channel the magic into the weapon and it autmatically discharges at the first hit. I know that the other strikers have to spend a minor action to "mark" their prey (Hunters Querry or Warlocks Curse) but I had no idea to make that work with the channel magic. I mean mechanic wise sure. But it should also fit the fluff. And to spend a minor action every time you want to deal extra damage is kind of lame. Thats why I put the "first hit" clause in.Hmm the problem with the buzz is, that I don't want to go over the top. He should be viable but not better than the others. I think the whole teleporting makes it quite powerfull...But again what do you think?</blockquote>