Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Aside from Expertise, what are the most commonly acknowledged feat-tax feats?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mengu" data-source="post: 5096285" data-attributes="member: 65726"><p>I see what people are saying with Expertise being a choice, and that adjusting the game math is in the hands of the DM, as they determine the difficulty of encounter, and encounter compositions. But it is a choice that simply trumps so many others, that it pushes itself in front of other feats. Before Expertise came along, Nimble Blade was a fantastic feat. However Expertise is clearly better, and should be taken before Nimble Strike since it applies to every attack. You look at the plethora of feats that give a conditional +1 attack bonus (Combat Reflexes, Arcane Spellfury, Oncoming Storm, Coordinated Explosion, Reckless Curse, Prime Strike, Resonating Covenant, Strong Willed Summoning... it's a very long list), and Expertise trumps every single one of them. At level 15, it trumps all the conditional +2 attack bonus feats.</p><p></p><p>So if a character is planning on spending one feat on boosting accuracy, it will be Expertise. As tactically important as it is to land encounter and daily powers, I can't really come up with a good reason why one would make the choice to not boost their chances to hit.</p><p></p><p>Let's not call it a feat tax, because it's not really required to make a character function in his role. You can still hit without Expertise albeit less often. And if all you care about is soaking up damage, then maybe you don't care about hitting anything, fine. Something that is necessary for a character to play their primary or secondary role would be considered more of a feat tax. For instance for Rageblood Barbarians who are supposed to be secondary role defenders, Hide Armor Expertise sure feels like a feat tax. For many Hybrids, Hybrid Talent is a feat tax for them to function at all (and this tax is clearly intentional).</p><p></p><p>Expertise is maybe not a feat tax, but it's a feat that's very difficult to pass up for many characters, and it's a feat that can change a sizable accuracy difference between characters (say a 20 dex halfling rogue with dagger and a 16 strength dwarf warden with an axe have 4 points of attack bonus difference), into something unsurmountable at epic (7 points of attack bonus difference if the warden won't take expertise).</p><p></p><p>Call it tax, or not tax, Expertise is simply not a good feat on it's own. In games I run or play, I prefer if it is either disallowed, or given for free. Otherwise, I'll just pick it up before level 6, and call it a day, but I also will not play a character who relies on multiple weapons, or a weapon and an implement in such a game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mengu, post: 5096285, member: 65726"] I see what people are saying with Expertise being a choice, and that adjusting the game math is in the hands of the DM, as they determine the difficulty of encounter, and encounter compositions. But it is a choice that simply trumps so many others, that it pushes itself in front of other feats. Before Expertise came along, Nimble Blade was a fantastic feat. However Expertise is clearly better, and should be taken before Nimble Strike since it applies to every attack. You look at the plethora of feats that give a conditional +1 attack bonus (Combat Reflexes, Arcane Spellfury, Oncoming Storm, Coordinated Explosion, Reckless Curse, Prime Strike, Resonating Covenant, Strong Willed Summoning... it's a very long list), and Expertise trumps every single one of them. At level 15, it trumps all the conditional +2 attack bonus feats. So if a character is planning on spending one feat on boosting accuracy, it will be Expertise. As tactically important as it is to land encounter and daily powers, I can't really come up with a good reason why one would make the choice to not boost their chances to hit. Let's not call it a feat tax, because it's not really required to make a character function in his role. You can still hit without Expertise albeit less often. And if all you care about is soaking up damage, then maybe you don't care about hitting anything, fine. Something that is necessary for a character to play their primary or secondary role would be considered more of a feat tax. For instance for Rageblood Barbarians who are supposed to be secondary role defenders, Hide Armor Expertise sure feels like a feat tax. For many Hybrids, Hybrid Talent is a feat tax for them to function at all (and this tax is clearly intentional). Expertise is maybe not a feat tax, but it's a feat that's very difficult to pass up for many characters, and it's a feat that can change a sizable accuracy difference between characters (say a 20 dex halfling rogue with dagger and a 16 strength dwarf warden with an axe have 4 points of attack bonus difference), into something unsurmountable at epic (7 points of attack bonus difference if the warden won't take expertise). Call it tax, or not tax, Expertise is simply not a good feat on it's own. In games I run or play, I prefer if it is either disallowed, or given for free. Otherwise, I'll just pick it up before level 6, and call it a day, but I also will not play a character who relies on multiple weapons, or a weapon and an implement in such a game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Aside from Expertise, what are the most commonly acknowledged feat-tax feats?
Top