Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SubDude" data-source="post: 7230521" data-attributes="member: 6790261">I believe the PHB is explicitly clear that your ASI / Feats are tied only to your class levels.&nbsp; Thus a multi-classed Fighter 3 / Rogue 3 has zero ASI's / Feats (assuming no Variant Human feat).That said, I know of at least one DM who is purposefully &quot;misinterpreting&quot; this rule to allow ASI's and Feats at Character levels 4, 8, 12, 16, and 19.&nbsp; &quot;That depends on how you interpret the rule,&quot; she says.She's clearly wrong that this is a matter of &quot;interpreting,&quot; and is House Ruling to get to her desired &quot;interpretation.&quot;&nbsp; I asked how she handled the fighter's extra ASI's and she said THOSE ASI's are tied to class level.&nbsp; Weird, but okay.Given all this, are there any unforeseen pitfalls that you'd expect from playing the game this way?&nbsp; There'd be less &quot;cost&quot; to multi-classing, so there'd probably be more multi-classing and potentially more feats.&nbsp; I don't think this breaks the game.&nbsp; What, if anything, am I missing?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SubDude, post: 7230521, member: 6790261"] I believe the PHB is explicitly clear that your ASI / Feats are tied only to your class levels. Thus a multi-classed Fighter 3 / Rogue 3 has zero ASI's / Feats (assuming no Variant Human feat). That said, I know of at least one DM who is purposefully "misinterpreting" this rule to allow ASI's and Feats at Character levels 4, 8, 12, 16, and 19. "That depends on how you interpret the rule," she says. She's clearly wrong that this is a matter of "interpreting," and is House Ruling to get to her desired "interpretation." I asked how she handled the fighter's extra ASI's and she said THOSE ASI's are tied to class level. Weird, but okay. Given all this, are there any unforeseen pitfalls that you'd expect from playing the game this way? There'd be less "cost" to multi-classing, so there'd probably be more multi-classing and potentially more feats. I don't think this breaks the game. What, if anything, am I missing? [/QUOTE]

Verification