Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6686839" data-attributes="member: 177">Yes.&nbsp; I left this nuance off - the imbalance would arise in the time when very heavy and energetic particles were far more common - and one of those super-heavy particles could be the culprit that led to the very small imbalance in matter.The most intriguing idea I saw actually linked it to the inflation-multiverse concept discussed above.&nbsp; That regions of the universe fell out of the inflation mode, and into regions of universe we think of with &quot;normal&quot; rate of expansion *because* they had developed a predominance of matter or antimatter, by mere statistical variation.&nbsp; Regions where matter and antimatter were balanced continued in full inflation mode, giving rise to isolated &quot;bubble&quot; universes of one form of matter or the other, in a sea of vast inflationary universe.I no longer have the math supporting this suggestion on hand.&nbsp; I'll see if I can find a reference.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6686839, member: 177"] Yes. I left this nuance off - the imbalance would arise in the time when very heavy and energetic particles were far more common - and one of those super-heavy particles could be the culprit that led to the very small imbalance in matter. The most intriguing idea I saw actually linked it to the inflation-multiverse concept discussed above. That regions of the universe fell out of the inflation mode, and into regions of universe we think of with "normal" rate of expansion *because* they had developed a predominance of matter or antimatter, by mere statistical variation. Regions where matter and antimatter were balanced continued in full inflation mode, giving rise to isolated "bubble" universes of one form of matter or the other, in a sea of vast inflationary universe. I no longer have the math supporting this suggestion on hand. I'll see if I can find a reference. [/QUOTE]

Verification