Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 6639559" data-attributes="member: 8461">Well crud, that's awful news. I hope that Mrs. Greenwood gets better soon! Fair enough; I didn't think you were pulling things out of thin air, after all. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Leaving aside the middle(wo)man issues, which still strike me as rather odd, it's cool that Ed's answering these questions, but I still don't see much in the way of this being unambiguously &quot;canon,&quot; per se. That is, this doesn't speak to the issues of what exactly is the nature of that contractual stipulation with regards to whatever he says being &quot;canon&quot; unless WotC says otherwise. That is to say, these posts seem to be Ed doing what he does: spinning yarns (particularly with regards to his published stories). Likewise, that last post is just a tale from his home game. It's entertaining, and very interesting, but the entirety of the &quot;canon&quot; argument remains &quot;it's in a contract, for which no details or further information shall be provided,&quot; as told to us by someone on the internet who says they have Ed's ear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 6639559, member: 8461"] Well crud, that's awful news. I hope that Mrs. Greenwood gets better soon! Fair enough; I didn't think you were pulling things out of thin air, after all. ;) Leaving aside the middle(wo)man issues, which still strike me as rather odd, it's cool that Ed's answering these questions, but I still don't see much in the way of this being unambiguously "canon," per se. That is, this doesn't speak to the issues of what exactly is the nature of that contractual stipulation with regards to whatever he says being "canon" unless WotC says otherwise. That is to say, these posts seem to be Ed doing what he does: spinning yarns (particularly with regards to his published stories). Likewise, that last post is just a tale from his home game. It's entertaining, and very interesting, but the entirety of the "canon" argument remains "it's in a contract, for which no details or further information shall be provided," as told to us by someone on the internet who says they have Ed's ear. [/QUOTE]

Verification