Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Assassinate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 6692699" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>All the wizard needs to use his reaction is an attack that hits. This has nothing to do with whether or not he notices the assassin, himself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So the assassin stays hidden for the duration of a single die roll? Is that what's bothering you? Because once the attack is made, it will either hit or miss. There is no third option. The attack roll determines whether the attack is a hit or a miss, so as soon as the attack is made (i.e. the moment the die is rolled at the table) this question has been resolved one way or the other.</p><p></p><p>This really gets to the level of abstraction in the D&D combat system and what the attack roll represents in the narrative. A lot of people that have written posts on ENWorld don't narrate every attack that hits as doing real physical damage. A "hit" needn't ever make actual contact to incur hit point damage. A character might experience a reduction in hit points because of the effort it takes to avoid a lethal blow, or have their resolve worn down by the attempts of their foe to strike them, the loss of that resolve represented by taking damage. Not until the final blow that drops that character to zero hit points is there any reason to narrate a "hit" as making physical contact. If you think about this, it makes a lot of sense. How many times do you think someone can be struck with a sword before they lose enough blood to fall unconscious? Probably not too many, and yet high level characters are able to absorb tens of "hits" from such a weapon with no impairment to their functionality. This is what the Basic Rules have to say about this issue:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>So really the issue of narrating the "hit", and the logic of the resulting ability of a mage to cast Shield, is left entirely up to you as the DM, and any inability to credibly narrate these events is not due to any fault to be found in the rules as written, but is due entirely to a lack of imagination on the part of the DM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 6692699, member: 6787503"] All the wizard needs to use his reaction is an attack that hits. This has nothing to do with whether or not he notices the assassin, himself. So the assassin stays hidden for the duration of a single die roll? Is that what's bothering you? Because once the attack is made, it will either hit or miss. There is no third option. The attack roll determines whether the attack is a hit or a miss, so as soon as the attack is made (i.e. the moment the die is rolled at the table) this question has been resolved one way or the other. This really gets to the level of abstraction in the D&D combat system and what the attack roll represents in the narrative. A lot of people that have written posts on ENWorld don't narrate every attack that hits as doing real physical damage. A "hit" needn't ever make actual contact to incur hit point damage. A character might experience a reduction in hit points because of the effort it takes to avoid a lethal blow, or have their resolve worn down by the attempts of their foe to strike them, the loss of that resolve represented by taking damage. Not until the final blow that drops that character to zero hit points is there any reason to narrate a "hit" as making physical contact. If you think about this, it makes a lot of sense. How many times do you think someone can be struck with a sword before they lose enough blood to fall unconscious? Probably not too many, and yet high level characters are able to absorb tens of "hits" from such a weapon with no impairment to their functionality. This is what the Basic Rules have to say about this issue: So really the issue of narrating the "hit", and the logic of the resulting ability of a mage to cast Shield, is left entirely up to you as the DM, and any inability to credibly narrate these events is not due to any fault to be found in the rules as written, but is due entirely to a lack of imagination on the part of the DM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Assassinate
Top