Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Assassinate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paraxis" data-source="post: 6695802" data-attributes="member: 13009"><p>If the monk is snoozing he would be unconscious and not able to take reactions. </p><p></p><p>Incapacitated is the condition that prevents you from taking actions or reactions. </p><p></p><p>The paralyzed, petrified, stunned and unconscious conditions all also make you incapacitated.</p><p></p><p>So as long as the monk meets all the requirements to use his deflect missiles ability they can use it. Those requirements are having a reaction to use, being able to use a reaction (so not being incapacitated for example), and being hit by a ranged missile weapon. </p><p></p><p>In your example a blind monk who is meditating is attacked with a ranged missile weapon, they can indeed use their deflect missiles ability. Now we can get this back to the topic of surprise, if the monk is surprised they can not use reactions until they have taken their first turn.</p><p></p><p>So this is how it would play out in my game.</p><p></p><p>Blind elf monk who is meditating during a long rest is in a "semi-conscious" state, I rule that they are not unconscious some DM's rule differently. An assassin fires a bow out from the cover of trees and darkness (not that it matters because the guy is blind) at the monk. Initiative is rolled. If the assassin goes first all is good for him, the monk is still surprised and can't use reactions the assassin if he doesn't roll poorly and miss will hit and do his sneak attack damage and it will be a critical hit. If on the other hand the blind monk wins initiative (doubtful because I would most likely apply disadvantage for being in the middle of meditation and being ambushed) and goes first by the time the assassin fires his arrow the monk can use their reaction to deflect the missile and because the monk is no longer surprised the attack is not an automatic critical hit. The monk will reduce the damage by 1d10+ dex mod + monk level, if the monk reduces it down to 0, and has a free hand, they could catch the arrow and throw it back at the assassin, as the reaction interrupted the assassins turn the assassin hasn't had a chance to bonus action hide yet, and the attack revealed the assassins location, the monk spends a ki point and hurls the arrow back at the assassin, with disadvantage obviously because he is blind.</p><p></p><p>I think the above works by the rules of the game, and for narrative reasons no matter who wins the initiative. I even think the monk throwing the arrow back is much more entertaining for everyone at the table.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paraxis, post: 6695802, member: 13009"] If the monk is snoozing he would be unconscious and not able to take reactions. Incapacitated is the condition that prevents you from taking actions or reactions. The paralyzed, petrified, stunned and unconscious conditions all also make you incapacitated. So as long as the monk meets all the requirements to use his deflect missiles ability they can use it. Those requirements are having a reaction to use, being able to use a reaction (so not being incapacitated for example), and being hit by a ranged missile weapon. In your example a blind monk who is meditating is attacked with a ranged missile weapon, they can indeed use their deflect missiles ability. Now we can get this back to the topic of surprise, if the monk is surprised they can not use reactions until they have taken their first turn. So this is how it would play out in my game. Blind elf monk who is meditating during a long rest is in a "semi-conscious" state, I rule that they are not unconscious some DM's rule differently. An assassin fires a bow out from the cover of trees and darkness (not that it matters because the guy is blind) at the monk. Initiative is rolled. If the assassin goes first all is good for him, the monk is still surprised and can't use reactions the assassin if he doesn't roll poorly and miss will hit and do his sneak attack damage and it will be a critical hit. If on the other hand the blind monk wins initiative (doubtful because I would most likely apply disadvantage for being in the middle of meditation and being ambushed) and goes first by the time the assassin fires his arrow the monk can use their reaction to deflect the missile and because the monk is no longer surprised the attack is not an automatic critical hit. The monk will reduce the damage by 1d10+ dex mod + monk level, if the monk reduces it down to 0, and has a free hand, they could catch the arrow and throw it back at the assassin, as the reaction interrupted the assassins turn the assassin hasn't had a chance to bonus action hide yet, and the attack revealed the assassins location, the monk spends a ki point and hurls the arrow back at the assassin, with disadvantage obviously because he is blind. I think the above works by the rules of the game, and for narrative reasons no matter who wins the initiative. I even think the monk throwing the arrow back is much more entertaining for everyone at the table. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Assassinate
Top