Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="paradox42" data-source="post: 5981747" data-attributes="member: 29746">Not to thread-hijack, but this is exactly what I did myself when updating the old "Paladins of alternate alignments" classes my setting has featured since way back in 1st Edition to PF. Archetypes, I decided after trying a few things out, just didn't go far enough, so I did alternate classes just as Paizo themselves did (with the Antipaladin). In particular, I made the Freedom Knight (CG, focused on Smite Law and taking down any authority that gets too onerous) and the Oppressor (LE, focused on Smite Chaos and keeping the rabble under the thumb of tyrants where they belong). Those were just my choices though; the four-way symmetry of the opposed forces appeals to me. Other choices could certainly be made.But, that James Jacobs quote is a good one to go back to for the Assassin- fluff is really all that's necessary to change the class to make it possible to be non-Evil. There's wiggle room, and that's the important thing here for the OP (whom I got the impression of, as being a GM, FWIW).</blockquote>