Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Assassins: Is Neutral okay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 5991309" data-attributes="member: 95493"><p>Okay, I went looking and the only reference to Vassal of Bahamut I can find is in the Book of Exalted deeds. If you are using a different source then I can look at that one too.</p><p></p><p>So based on that I am going to make some assumptions based solely on the language used. I can't quote the Book of Exalted but I can paraphrase. The vassal of bahamut must single-handedly slay a juvenile (or older) red dragon. This version only mentions red dragons and it mentions the act must be completed before joining. Now what it doesn't mention is: that the paladin* must do this for no other reason than to join. The paladin may have done this because he was commanded to by the head of his church, or he may have been compelled to by a vision from his god, perhaps he just happened across a juvenile red dragon and slayed it all by himself out of the course of adventuring. But he isn't required and probably didn't do it JUST TO JOIN A GROUP. To me this seems pretty clearly to indicate the paladin is doing it because the red dragon is a red dragon and EVIL and needed to be put down.</p><p></p><p>The Assassin on the other hand MUST kill someone for no other reason than to join. That is their goal. It isn't clear if the guild assigns the target or not, but the motivation seems clear here. To me this seems pretty clear that the Assassin doesn't care who the target is or their alignment or anything about them EXCEPT that they need to be put down so the Assassin can join up.</p><p></p><p>If you want to talk about the legitimacy that the class have the restrictions like that at all that is fine. I was giving my opinion based solely on how the rules and classes work NOW, not what they should be in your game.</p><p></p><p>And certainly there is a certain measure of alignments being in the grey in DnD. But paladins aren't and red dragons aren't. Assassins aren't really either, though I've admitted I can see (non classed) assassins being of any alignment based on motivation. I do see the motivation of joining other assassins and killing someone for no other reason than to join to be fairly clear cut as evil even in DnD's grey area. If you disagree that is fine but I'm giving you the best information I have on how the game DOES work not on how it SHOULD work.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and if this is your entire point then that is fine, just let me know and we can be done as I'm not going to argue it.</p><p></p><p>* the rules actually doesn't mention 'paladin' but we'll skip that part for now, it does say LG and kills a dragon so we can easily assume paladin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tovec, post: 5991309, member: 95493"] Okay, I went looking and the only reference to Vassal of Bahamut I can find is in the Book of Exalted deeds. If you are using a different source then I can look at that one too. So based on that I am going to make some assumptions based solely on the language used. I can't quote the Book of Exalted but I can paraphrase. The vassal of bahamut must single-handedly slay a juvenile (or older) red dragon. This version only mentions red dragons and it mentions the act must be completed before joining. Now what it doesn't mention is: that the paladin* must do this for no other reason than to join. The paladin may have done this because he was commanded to by the head of his church, or he may have been compelled to by a vision from his god, perhaps he just happened across a juvenile red dragon and slayed it all by himself out of the course of adventuring. But he isn't required and probably didn't do it JUST TO JOIN A GROUP. To me this seems pretty clearly to indicate the paladin is doing it because the red dragon is a red dragon and EVIL and needed to be put down. The Assassin on the other hand MUST kill someone for no other reason than to join. That is their goal. It isn't clear if the guild assigns the target or not, but the motivation seems clear here. To me this seems pretty clear that the Assassin doesn't care who the target is or their alignment or anything about them EXCEPT that they need to be put down so the Assassin can join up. If you want to talk about the legitimacy that the class have the restrictions like that at all that is fine. I was giving my opinion based solely on how the rules and classes work NOW, not what they should be in your game. And certainly there is a certain measure of alignments being in the grey in DnD. But paladins aren't and red dragons aren't. Assassins aren't really either, though I've admitted I can see (non classed) assassins being of any alignment based on motivation. I do see the motivation of joining other assassins and killing someone for no other reason than to join to be fairly clear cut as evil even in DnD's grey area. If you disagree that is fine but I'm giving you the best information I have on how the game DOES work not on how it SHOULD work. Oh, and if this is your entire point then that is fine, just let me know and we can be done as I'm not going to argue it. * the rules actually doesn't mention 'paladin' but we'll skip that part for now, it does say LG and kills a dragon so we can easily assume paladin. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Assassins: Is Neutral okay?
Top